[1]林天胜,张庆洪①,蔡桦立,等.术前营养支持在腹腔镜右半结肠癌根治术快速康复治疗中的临床意义[J].中国微创外科杂志,2017,17(08):683-687.
　Lin Tiansheng*,Zhang Qinghong,Cai Huali*,et al.Clinical Significance of Preoperative Nutritional Support Based on Fast Track Surgery Guideline in Laparoscopicassisted Radical Right Hemicolectomy[J].Chinese Journal of Minimally Invasive Surgery,2017,17(08):683-687.
点击复制

术前营养支持在腹腔镜右半结肠癌根治术快速康复治疗中的临床意义()
分享到：

《中国微创外科杂志》[ISSN:1009-6604/CN:11-4526/R]

卷:
17
期数:
2017年08期
页码:
683-687
栏目:
临床论著
出版日期:
2017-08-20

文章信息/Info

Title:
Clinical Significance of Preoperative Nutritional Support Based on Fast Track Surgery Guideline in Laparoscopicassisted Radical Right Hemicolectomy
作者:
林天胜; 张庆洪①; 蔡桦立; 熊迪生; 尤俊*
厦门大学附属第一医院厦门市肿瘤医院胃肠肿瘤外科，厦门361003
Author(s):
Lin Tiansheng*;  Zhang Qinghong;  Cai Huali*;  et al.
*Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Xiamen Cancer Hospital, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xiamen University, Xiamen 361003, China
关键词:
术前营养支持; 快速康复外科; 腹腔镜; 右半结肠癌根治术
Keywords:
Preoperative nutritional support; Fast track surgery; Laparoscopy; Radical right hemicolectomy
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
目的探讨术前营养支持在腹腔镜右半结肠癌根治术后康复中的临床意义。方法回顾性分析2014年2月~2015年11月我科147例右半结肠癌的临床资料，其中68例接受快速康复治疗（fast track surgery，FTS），79例依我院常规执行围术期准备及处理，比较2组术后恢复情况及术后并发症等方面的差异。结果与常规组相比，FTS组在术后胃管留置时间［(1.6±0.6)d vs.(3.0±0.9) d,t=-10.565,P=0.000］，腹腔引流管留置时间［(4.2±1.1)d vs.(9.3±2.3) d，t=-16.700,P=0.000］，导尿管留置时间［(3.3±0.8)d vs.(3.7±1.0) d,t=-2.804,P=0.006］，首次下地活动时间［(2.2±0.4)d vs.(2.5±0.6) d,t=-3.506,P=0.000］，首次肛门排气时间［(3.4±0.9)d vs.(3.8±0.8) d,t=-2.853,P=0.002］以及术后住院时间［(8.6±2.7) d vs.(12.4±2.3) d,t=-9.369,P=0.000］明显缩短，而首次肛门排便时间无显著性差异［(4.5±1.1)d vs. (4.8±1.2) d, t=-1.570,P=0.059］。与常规组相比，FTS组术后非手术部位感染的发生率减少［1.5%(1/68)vs. 11.4%(9/79), χ2=4.217，P=0.040］，而手术部位感染的发生率无显著差异［4.4%(3/68) vs. 11.4%(9/79), χ2=2.375, P=0.123］。结论基于FTS指南的术前营养支持减少了腹腔镜右半结肠癌根治术后非手术部位感染相关并发症，缩短术后住院时间，可使患者受益。
Abstract:
ObjectiveTo investigate the impact of preoperative nutritional support based on fast track surgery (FTS) guideline in laparoscopicassisted radical right hemicolectomy.MethodsThe study was a single center retrospective analysis based on cases from February 2014 to November 2015, 147 cases in total, including 68 cases of FTS and 79 cases of routine treatment, to analyze the impact of preoperative nutritional support on the complication rate and outcome of patients.ResultsCompared with the routine group, the FTS group had significantly reduced duration of nasogastric intubation ［(1.6±0.6) d vs. (3.0±0.9) d, t=-10.565, P=0.000］, peritoneal cavity drainage ［(4.2±1.1) d vs. (9.3±2.3) d, t=-16.700, P=0000］, urinary drainage ［(3.3±0.8) d vs. (3.7±1.0) d, t=-2.804, P=0.006］, first postoperative walk ［(2.2±0.4) d vs. (2.5±0.6) d, t=-3.506, P=0.000］, postoperative anal exhaust ［(3.4±0.9) d vs. (3.8±0.8) d, t=-2.853, P=0002］ and the postoperative hospital stay ［(8.6±2.7) d vs. (12.4±2.3) d, t=-9.369, P=0.000］. The postoperative anal defecate ［(4.5±1.1) d vs. (4.8±1.2) d, t=-1.570, P=0.059］ had no significant difference. The shortterm complications were also proved with less occurrence as compared with the control group. Compared with the routine group, the FTS group developed less non surgical site infection ［1.5% (1/68) vs. 11.4% (9/79), χ2=4.217, P=0.040］, however, the occurrence of surgical site infection was not significantly reduced ［4.4% (3/68) vs. 11.4% (9/79), χ2=2.375, P=0.123］.ConclusionThe preoperative nutritional support based on FTS guideline is beneficial in patients received laparoscopicassisted radical right hemicolectomy.

参考文献/References:

[1]Johansen N,Kondrup J,Plum LM,et al.Effect of nutritional support on clinical outcome in patients at nutritional risk.Clin Nutr,2004,23(4): 539-550.
[2]Kondrup J,Allison SP,Elia M,et al.Educational and Clinical Practice Committee,European Society of Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition (ESPEN).ESPEN guidelines for nutrition screening 2002.Clin Nutr,2003,22(4):415-421.
[3]Gustafsson UO,Scott MJ,Schwenk W,et al.Guidelines for perioperative care in elective colonic surgery: Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) Society recommendations.World J Surg,2013,37(2):259-284.
[4]Basse L,Hjort Jakobsen D,Billesblle P,et al.A clinical pathway to accelerate recovery after colonic resection.Ann Surg,2000,232(1):51-57.
[5]Wind J,Hofland J,Preckel B,et al.Perioperative strategy in colonic surgery; LAparoscopy and/or FAst track multimodal management versus standard care (LAFA trial).BMC Surg,2006,6:16.
[6]王天宝，石汉平，林维浩，等.快速康复外科在结肠癌围手术期应用价值的初步探讨.中华肿瘤防治杂志,2010,17(22):1868-1870.
[7]夏萍，史俏蓉，霍永忠，等.欧洲营养风险筛查方法NRS-2002简介及应用现状.现代预防医学,2007,34(15):2860-2861，2866.
[8]Yeatman TJ.Nutritional support for the surgical oncology patient.Cancer Control,2000,7(6): 563-565.
[9]Mkel JT,Kiviniemi H,Laitinen S.Risk factors for anastomotic leakage after leftsided colorectal resection with rectal anastomosis.Dis Colon Rectum,2003,46(5): 653-660.
[10]Von Meyenfeldt MF,Meijerink WJ,Rouflart MM,et al.Perioperative nutritional support: a randomised clinical trial.Clin Nutr,1992,11(4):180-186.
[11]Kabata P,Jastrzebski T,Kakol M,et al.Preoperative nutritional support in cancer patients with no clinical signs of malnutrition:prospective randomized controlled trial.Support Care Cancer,2015,23(2): 365-370.
[12]江志伟，李宁，黎介寿.快速康复外科的概念及临床意义.中国实用外科杂志,2007,27(2):131-133.
[13]van der Pas MH,Haglind E,Cuesta MA,et al.Laparoscopic versus open surgery for rectal cancer (COLOR Ⅱ): shortterm outcomes of a randomised,phase 3 trial.Lancet Oncol,2013,14(3): 210-218.
[14]Rahman A,Corbett C.Nutrition in the acute phase of critical illness.N Engl J Med,2014,370(25): 2450.
[15]孙涛，傅卫.快速康复外科的现状与展望.中国微创外科杂志,2007,7(6):564-566.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
*通讯作者，Email：youjunxm@163.com①麻醉手术科
更新日期/Last Update: 2017-11-22