[1]陈郁鲜,曾权①,路云翔,等.肩关节镜下去除肱骨近端锁定钢板的应用[J].中国微创外科杂志,2016,16(12):1108-1112.
　Chen Yuxian*,Zeng Quan,Lu Yunxiang*,et al.Preliminary Application of Arthroscopic Removal of Proximal Humeral Locking Plates[J].Chinese Journal of Minimally Invasive Surgery,2016,16(12):1108-1112.
点击复制

肩关节镜下去除肱骨近端锁定钢板的应用()
分享到：

《中国微创外科杂志》[ISSN:1009-6604/CN:11-4526/R]

卷:
16
期数:
2016年12期
页码:
1108-1112
栏目:
临床研究
出版日期:
2016-12-20

文章信息/Info

Title:
Preliminary Application of Arthroscopic Removal of Proximal Humeral Locking Plates
作者:
陈郁鲜; 曾权①; 路云翔; 彭优; 任建华; 李智勇**
中山大学附属第三医院关节创伤骨科，广州510630
Author(s):
Chen Yuxian*;  Zeng Quan;  Lu Yunxiang*;  et al.
*Department of Joint/Traumatology, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510630, China
关键词:
肩关节镜;  肱骨近端骨折; 去除钢板
Keywords:
Shoulder arthroscopy; Proximal humeral fracture; Removing plate
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
目的探讨采用肩关节镜技术去除肱骨近端锁定钢板的临床应用价值。方法回顾性分析2013年9月~2015年12月肱骨近端锁定钢板内固定术后疼痛及活动受限15例资料，男10例，女5例，内固定术后12~24（13.6±4.7）月，年龄29~72（46.3±2.4）岁，左侧4例，右侧11例，均应用标准肩关节镜技术去除肱骨近端锁定钢板。结果15例均顺利通过肩关节镜取出肱骨近端锁定钢板，12例采用3个切口（近端2个切口长0.5 cm，外下方切口长约2 cm），3例附加一后方入路（长约0.5 cm）行盂唇清理、肩峰成形及关节囊松解术。手术时间30~90（50.2±4.6）min。术后切口均一期愈合，住院时间3～4 d。术后随访3～12（6.1±1.8）月。Neer评分术前55~85（69.2±8.4）分，术后3个月80~95（93.4±3.3）分，明显提高（t=-13.524，P=0.000）。结论肩关节镜下去除肱骨近端锁定钢板具有切口小、创伤小、切口感染风险低、三角肌干扰小等优势，且肩关节镜能够协助诊治肱骨近端内固定术后肩关节周围及盂肱关节内伴随的病变，值得在临床上推广应用。
Abstract:
ObjectiveTo investigate the clinical value of shoulder arthroscopy to remove the locking proximal humeral plate.MethodsBetween September 2013 and December 2015, 15 cases of proximal humeral locking plate fixation, 10 males and 5 females, were retrospectively analyzed. The time post-operation ranged 12-24 months (mean, 13.6±4.7 months), and the age ranged 29-72 (mean, 46.3±2.4) years old. There were 4 left sided cases and 11 right sided cases. The proximal humeral locking plate was removed by utilizing standard shoulder arthroscopy in all the patients.ResultsThe locking proximal humeral plate was successfully removed by shoulder arthroscopy in all the 15 cases. The operation was performed with 3 incisions in 12 cases (2 proximal incisions 0.5 cm in length and an incision inferior to external arm 2 cm in length). For acromioplasty and joint capsule lysis, an additional posterior approach about 0.5 cm in length was required in 3 cases. The operation consumed 30-90 min (mean, 50.2±46 min). All the incisions were healed at first intention. The hospitalization time was 3-4 days. Postoperative follow-up ranged 3-12 months (mean, 6.1±1.8 months). Preoperative Neer scores were 55-85 (69.2±8.4) points, which were improved to 80-95 (93.4±3.3) points postoperatively (t=-13.524, P=0.000).ConclusionsThere are some advantages in removing locking proximal humeral plate by standard shoulder arthroscopy, such as smaller incision, less trauma, lower risk of wound infection, less deltoid disturbance, and so on. Simultaneously, the shoulder arthroscopy can assist in diagnosis and treatment of complications around the shoulder joint and glenohumeral joint after proximal humeral internal fixation. The operation is worthy of clinical application.

参考文献/References:

[1]Jung SW,Shim SB,Kim HM,et al.Factors that influence reduction loss in proximal humerus fracture surgery.J Orthop Trauma,2015,29(6):276-282.
[2]Carbone S,Papalia M.The amount of impaction and loss of reduction in osteoporotic proximal humeral fractures after surgical fixation.Osteoporos Int,2016,27(2):627-633.
[3]郑炜,陈建文,吴雪华,等.老年肱骨近端骨折锁定钢板的应用.浙江创伤外科,2014,19(2):255-256.
[4]黄磊,李广旭,李波,等.PHILOS锁定加压接骨板和肱骨近端锁定加压接骨板治疗肱骨近端骨折.中国组织工程研究与临床康复,2010,14(52):9861-9864.
[5]Silverstein MP,Yirenkyi K,Haidukewych G,et al.Analysis of failure with the use of locked plates for stabilization of proximal humerus fractures.Bull Hosp Jt Dis (2013),2015,73(3):185-189.
[6]Burke NG,Kennedy J,Green C,et al.Locking plate fixation for proximal humerus fractures.Orthopedics,2012,35(2):250-254.
[7]Maqdes A,Levy B,Klouche S,et al.The feasibility and results of an arthroscopic removal of humeral locking plates and glenohumeral arthrolysis after proximal humeral fractures.Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc,2014,22(2):456-461.
[8]Dines JS,Hettrich C,Kelly BT,et al.Arthroscopic removal of proximal humerus locking plates. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc,2010,18(3):409-411
[9]Voigt C,Geisler A,Lill H.Arthroscopic locking plate removal after proximal humeral fractures Arch Orthop Trauma Surg,2010,130(3):391-395.
[10]Aksu N,Gogus A,Kara AN,et al.Complications encountered in proximal humerus fractures treated with locking plate fixation.Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc,2010,44(2):89-96.
[11]Maman E,Dolkart O,Chechik O,et al.Arthroscopic findings of coexisting lesions with greater tuberosity fractures.Orthopedics，2014，37（3）：272-277.
[12]Lill H,Katthagen C,Jensen G,et al.Arthroscopic fracture management in proximal humeral fractures. Unfallchirurg,2013,116(4):296-304.
[13]Jeong JH,Shin SJ.Arthroscopic removal of proud metallic suture anchors after Bankart repair. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg,2009,129(8):1109-1115.
[14]Kim KC,Rhee KJ,Shin HD,et al.Arthroscopic removal of an intramedullary nail in the humerus.Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc,2007,15(7):922-926.
[15]Little MT,Berkes MB,Schottel PC,et al.The impact of preoperative coronal plane deformity on proximal humerus fixation with endosteal augmentation.Orthop Trauma,2014,28(6):338-347.
[16]Harrold F,Wigderowitz C.Humeral head arthroplasty and its ability to restore original humeral head geometry.J Shoulder Elbow Surg,2013,22(1):115-121.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
基金项目：广东省医学科研基金（编号:A2015115）**通讯作者，E-mail:doclizhiyong8369@163.com①（中山大学附属第三医院粤东医院骨科，梅州514000）
更新日期/Last Update: 2017-03-09