[1]胡岩 齐灿** 马立新① 郭付臣.非膀胱镜非麻醉下小儿输尿管双J管取出术与膀胱镜下取管的对比研究[J].中国微创外科杂志,2015,15(11):840-845.
　Hu Yan,Qi Can,Ma Lixin,et al.A Comparative Study Between Cystoscopic Removal of Pediatric Ureteral Double-J Tube Without Anesthesia and Traditional Method[J].Chinese Journal of Minimally Invasive Surgery,2015,15(11):840-845.
点击复制

非膀胱镜非麻醉下小儿输尿管双J管取出术与膀胱镜下取管的对比研究()
分享到：

《中国微创外科杂志》[ISSN:1009-6604/CN:11-4526/R]

卷:
15
期数:
2015年11期
页码:
840-845
栏目:
文献综述
出版日期:
2015-11-20

文章信息/Info

Title:
A Comparative Study Between Cystoscopic Removal of Pediatric Ureteral Double-J Tube Without Anesthesia and Traditional Method
作者:
胡岩 齐灿** 马立新① 郭付臣
（河北省儿童医院泌尿外科，石家庄050031)
Author(s):
Hu Yan;  Qi Can;  Ma Lixin;  et al.
Department of Urology, Children’s Hospital of Hebei Province, Shijiazhuang 050031, China
关键词:
小儿; 输尿管双J管; 膀胱镜; 麻醉; 肾积水
Keywords:
Pediatric; Ureteral double-J tube; Cystoscope; Anesthesia; Hydronephrosis
分类号:
R726.1
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
目的探讨非膀胱镜非麻醉下小儿输尿管双J管取出术的可行性。方法2014年1月~2015年5月留置输尿管双J管患儿50例，年龄10个月~8岁，按随机数字表法随机分成改良组和传统组各25例。改良组水合氯醛灌肠镇静，用丝线圈经导尿管取出双J管；传统组静脉吸入复合麻醉，F6或F8膀胱镜下取出双J管。比较2组成功率、手术时间、住院时间、术后排尿不适以及镜下血尿等指标。结果改良组成功取出23例，失败2例，传统组25例均成功取出，二者成功率差异无统计学意义（Fisher检验，P=0.490）。改良组和传统组手术时间分别为(14.3±3.6)和(40.2±4.1)min（t=-23630,P=0.000），住院时间分别为(1.2±0.4)和(2.7±0.6)d（t=-11.320,P=0.000），术后排尿不适分别为1例(4%)和8例(32%）（χ2=4.334,P=0.037），镜下血尿分别为1例（4%）和9例（36%）（χ2=5.484，P=0.019），差异均具有统计学意义。结论非膀胱镜非麻醉下小儿输尿管双J管取出术安全、可行、有效，值得临床推广。
Abstract:
ObjectiveTo investigate the feasibility of cystoscopic removal of pediatric ureteral double-J tube by means of operation without anesthesia.MethodsWe chose 50 children with ureteral double-J tube, aged between 10 months and 8 years old, from January 2014 to May 2015. The patients were randomly divided into two groups (25 cases in each group). The experimental group were given chloral hydrate composure by enema and the double-J tube was taken out by the urinary catheter with the surgical silk suture. In the control group, the double-J tube was taken out under cystoscope (F6 or F8) in anesthesia. The success rate, operation time, hospital stay, postoperative urination discomfort and microscopic haematuria were compared between the two groups. ResultsThe removal surgery was successfully accomplished in 23 cases in the experimental group, with 2 cases of failure. The removal was successfully completed in all the 25 cases in the control group. The success rates between the two groups were not significantly different (P=0.490). There were statistically significant differences between the experimental group and the control group in operation time ［(14.3±3.6) min vs. (40.2±4.1) min, t=-23.630, P=0.000］, hospital stay ［(1.2±0.4)d vs. (2.7±0.6) d, t=-11.320, P=0.000］, postoperative urination discomfort ［1 case (4%) vs. 8 cases (32%), χ2=4.334, P=0.037］ and microscopic haematuria ［1 case (4%) vs. 9 cases (36%), χ2=5.484, P=0.019］.ConclusionCystoscic removal surgery of pediatric ureteral double-J tube without anesthesia is safe, feasible, and effective, being worthy of clinical promotion.

参考文献/References:

[1]高晓芸，徐迪，贺晓伟，等.UPJO所致小儿重度肾积水的诊断和治疗方法研究.重庆医学,2015，44(14)：1974-1976.
[2]董武.小儿先天性重度肾积水的外科治疗分析.中国现代医生,2014,52(27)：15-17.
[3]Orikasa S.Congenital hydronephrosis.Ryoikibetsu Shokogun Shirizu,1997,16 Pt 1:387-395.
[4]Petrovski M,Simeonov R,Todorovikj L,et al.Congenital hydronephrosis:disease or condition?Prilozi,2014,35(2):123-130.
[5]王东文，张旭辉，曹晓明，等.改进后腹腔镜下离断式肾盂成形术(附65例报告).中国微创外科杂志,2012,12(2)：152-154.
[6]张略.尿液红细胞、白细胞干化学法检测与镜检结果的对比分析.中国现代药物应用,2015,9(1)：18-20.
[7]高平.输尿管支架管在128例泌尿系疾病患者中的应用分析.齐齐哈尔医学院学报,2011,32(10)：1628-1629.
[8]唐维寅，夏术阶.输尿管支架管对上尿路影响的研究进展.临床泌尿外科杂志,2012,27(9)：711-716.
[9]赵勇，唐华.输尿管支架管相关症状的防治.中华临床医师杂志(电子版),2012,6(10)：2746-2748.
[10]范清秀，赵纳，黄利娥.肾盂输尿管成形留置双J管术后并发症的观察及护理.全科护理,2015,13(2)：162-163.
[11]肖珂青，肖梅，杜向阳，等.上呼吸道感染患儿全身麻醉后致呼吸系统并发症的研究.中华医院感染学杂志,2014,24(16)：4121-4122.
[12]Cussen LJ.Dimensions of the normal ureter in infancy and childhood.Invest Urol,1967,5(2):164-178.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
基金项目：河北省2015年医学科学重点研究计划（20150554）**通讯作者，E-mail:doctercanqi@126.com①（北京铁路局石家庄铁路疾病预防控制所，石家庄050020）
更新日期/Last Update: 2016-02-03