[1]陈帆* 朱宏亮 钱洪军 易伟 谢先强.暂时性腹腔关闭与常规关腹技术治疗严重腹腔感染的临床对比[J].中国微创外科杂志,2015,15(7):628-631.
　Chen Fan,Zhu Hongliang,Qian Hongjun,et al.Clinical Comparison of Temporary Abdominal Closure and Conventional Abdominal Closure in the Treatment of Severe Abdominal Infection[J].Chinese Journal of Minimally Invasive Surgery,2015,15(7):628-631.
点击复制

暂时性腹腔关闭与常规关腹技术治疗严重腹腔感染的临床对比()
分享到：

《中国微创外科杂志》[ISSN:1009-6604/CN:11-4526/R]

卷:
15
期数:
2015年7期
页码:
628-631
栏目:
临床研究
出版日期:
2015-07-20

文章信息/Info

Title:
Clinical Comparison of Temporary Abdominal Closure and Conventional Abdominal Closure in the Treatment of Severe Abdominal Infection
作者:
陈帆* 朱宏亮 钱洪军 易伟 谢先强
（中国人民解放军第九四医院普外科，南昌330002）
Author(s):
Chen Fan;  Zhu Hongliang;  Qian Hongjun;  et al.
Department of General Surgery, No. 94 Hospital of PLA, Nanchang 330002, China
关键词:
负压封闭引流关闭系统; 暂时性腹腔关闭术; 严重腹腔感染; 腹腔内高压
Keywords:
Vacuum sealing drainage (VSD); Temporary abdominal closure (TAC); Severe abdominal infection; Intraabdominal hypertension (IAH)
分类号:
R619+.3
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
目的观察暂时性腹腔关闭（temporary abdominal closure，TAC）与常规关腹技术在严重腹腔感染中的临床效果。方法回顾性分析2010年3月~2014年7月15例严重腹腔感染的临床资料，其中8例采用负压封闭引流关闭系统（vacuum sealing drainage，VSD）行暂时性关腹，7例常规关腹。比较2组术后腹内压变化、创面愈合时间、术后并发症等。结果常规关腹组术后72 h内腹内压逐渐升高，术后6~72 h各监测的时间点均高于暂时性关腹组（P<0.01）。暂时性关腹组术后腹内压变化相对平稳（波动在7.7~18.1 mm Hg之间），创面愈合早［（11.3±1.8）d vs.（19.4±6.7）d，t=-3.142，P=0005］，切口感染少［12.5%（1/8）vs. 100%（6/6），P=0.005］。结论暂时性腹腔关闭技术在治疗严重腹腔感染中能有效地预防腹内压升高，促进创面愈合，减少术后并发症，疗效确切。
Abstract:
ObjectiveTo observe the clinical effect of temporary abdominal closure (TAC) and conventional abdominal closure technology for severe abdominal infection.MethodsA retrospective analysis was made on the clinical data of 15 cases of severe abdominal infection treated from March 2010 to July 2014, during which there were 8 cases of temporary abdominal closure and 7 cases of conventional abdominal closure. The change of intraabdominal pressure, the healing time of wound surface and the postoperative complications were compared respectively between the two groups.ResultsFor conventional abdominal closure, the postoperative intraabdominal pressure was increased gradually within 72 hours, with pressure at all observation time points within 6-72 hours higher than the temporary abdominal closure (P<0.01). In the temporary abdominal closure group, the change of intraabdominal pressure was relatively stable, the healing time of wound surface was faster ［(11.3±1.8) d vs. (19.4±6.7) d, t=-3.142, P=0.005］, and the incision infection was fewer ［12.5%(1/8) vs. 100% (6/6), P=0.005］.ConclusionTemporary abdominal closure technology could effectively reduce the intraabdominal pressure, promote wound healing, and reduce postoperative complications in the treatment of severe abdominal infection, with definite curative effects.

参考文献/References:

[1]李宏亮，朱曦.腹腔内高压与腹腔间隔室综合症.中国微创外科杂志，2006，6（7）：550-553.
[2]De Waele JJ,Leppaniemi AK. Temporary abdominal closure.Techniques.Am Surg,2011,77(S1)：S46-S50.
[3]伊敏，白宇，朱曦.腹腔内高压对危重患者器官功能的影响.中国微创外科杂志，2013，13（12）：1120-1123.
[4]《应用抗菌药物防治外科感染的指导意见》撰写协作组.应用抗菌药物防治外科感染的指导意见（草案）Ⅱ.中华外科杂志，2003，41（7）：552-554.
[5]陈煜，薛翔，王丽，等．腹腔筋膜室综合征对兔循环及呼吸功能的影响.南方医科大学学报，2012，32（9）：1312-1315.
[6]Haers PEJ,Van Straiten W,Stoelinga PJW,et al.Reconstruction of the severely resorbed mandible prior to vestibuloplasty or placement of endosseous implants.A 2 to 5 year followup.Int J Oral Maxillofac stag,1991,20(3):149-154.
[7]陈绍宗,许龙顺.封闭负压引流治疗创面.现代康复,2004,4(12):882-883.
[8]Kaplan M,Banwell P,Orgill DP,et al.Guidelines for the management of the open abdomen.Wounds,2005,17(1 Suppl):S1-S24.
[9]Open abdomen Advisory Panel,Campbell A,Chang M,et al.Management of the open abdomen:from initial operation to definitive closure.Am Surg,2009,75(11 Suppl):S1-S22.
[10]刘三凤,刘志豪,戴志波.负压封闭引流技术（VSD）对各种复杂创面修复的临床研究.当代医学，2009，15（6）：66-67.
[11]Labler L,Oehy K,Vacuum sealing of problem wounds.Swiss Surg,2008,8(6):266-272.
[12]Patel NY,Cogbill TH,Kalies KJ,et al.Temporary abdominal closure:longterm outcomes.J Trauma,2011,70(4):769-774.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
*通讯作者，Email:plingyun@126.com
更新日期/Last Update: 2016-01-04