[1]Áõ¾ü »ÆÁÖÆ½* ³Âƽ ÍõÄþ.Ó°ÏñÒýµ¼Õæ¿Õ¸¨ÖúÈéÏÙ´©´Ì»î¼ìÕï¶Ï ÈéÏÙ΢¸Æ»¯µÄÑо¿[J].Öйú΢´´Íâ¿ÆÔÓÖ¾,2015,15(6):509-514.
¡¡Liu Jun,Huang Linping,Chen Ping,et al.Image-guided Vacuum-assisted Breast Biopsy in the Diagnosis of Breast Microcalcifications[J].Chinese Journal of Minimally Invasive Surgery,2015,15(6):509-514.
µã»÷¸´ÖÆ

Ó°ÏñÒýµ¼Õæ¿Õ¸¨ÖúÈéÏÙ´©´Ì»î¼ìÕï¶Ï ÈéÏÙ΢¸Æ»¯µÄÑо¿()
·ÖÏíµ½£º

¡¶Öйú΢´´Íâ¿ÆÔÓÖ¾¡·[ISSN:1009-6604/CN:11-4526/R]

¾í:
15
ÆÚÊý:
2015Äê6ÆÚ
Ò³Âë:
509-514
À¸Ä¿:
ÁÙ´²ÂÛÖø
³ö°æÈÕÆÚ:
2015-06-20

ÎÄÕÂÐÅÏ¢/Info

Title:
Image-guided Vacuum-assisted Breast Biopsy in the Diagnosis of Breast Microcalcifications
×÷Õß:
Áõ¾ü »ÆÁÖÆ½* ³Âƽ ÍõÄþ
ÖÐÈÕÓѺÃÒ½ÔºÈéÏÙÖ×ÁöÖÐÐÄ£¬±±¾©100029
Author(s):
Liu Jun Huang Linping Chen Ping et al.
Breast Center, China-Japan Friendship Hospital, Beijing 100029, China
¹Ø¼ü´Ê:
Ó°ÏñÒýµ¼ÏÂÈéÏÙ´©´Ì»î¼ìÈéÏÙîâ°ÐÉãӰ΢¸Æ»¯³¬Éù¼ì²é
Keywords:
Image-guided breast biopsyMammographyMicrocalcificationsUltrasonography
·ÖÀàºÅ:
R655.704
ÎÄÏ×±êÖ¾Âë:
A
ÕªÒª:
Ä¿µÄÆÀ¼ÛÓ°ÏñÒýµ¼Õæ¿Õ¸¨Öú¿ÕÐÄÕëÈéÏÙ´©´Ì»î¼ì£¨vacuumª²assisted breast biopsy£¬VAB£©ÔÚÕï¶ÏÈéÏÙ΢¸Æ»¯ÖеÄÁÙ´²Ó¦ÓüÛÖµ¡£·½·¨2012Äê12ÔÂ~2014Äê8Ô£¬¶Ô42Àýîâ°ÐÕï¶ÏÈéÏÙ΢¸Æ»¯ÐÐVAB£¬ÃÀ¹ú·ÅÉäѧ»áÈéÏÙÓ°Ïñ±¨¸æÓëÕï¶Ïϵͳ£¨BIª²RADS£©·Ö¼¶3¼¶5Àý£¬4¼¶34Àý£¬5¼¶3Àý¡£ÆäÖÐ31Àýîâ°ÐÒýµ¼£¬11Àý³¬ÉùÒýµ¼¡£½á¹û42Àý»î¼ì±ê±¾ÔÚÓ°ÏñÉ϶¼Äܹ۲쵽¸Æ»¯Ôî²¢¾­²¡Àí֤ʵ£¬24Àý´Ø×´¸Æ»¯ÔîÍêÈ«Çгý£¬2Àý´Ø×´¼°16Àý·Ç´Ø×´¸Æ»¯Ô·ÖÇгý¡£²¡ÀíÕï¶Ïµ¼¹Üԭλ°©13Àý£¬½þÈóÐÔµ¼¹Ü°©5Àý£¬½þÈóÐÔСҶ°©1Àý£¬¾ùÐÐÊÖÊõÖÎÁÆ£¬ÆäÓà23Àý²¡ÀíΪÁ¼ÐÔ¡£îâ°Ð΢¸Æ»¯¼°³¬Éù΢¸Æ»¯Õï¶ÏÈéÏÙ°©µÄÑôÐÔÔ¤²âÖµ·Ö±ðΪ45.2%£¨19/42£©¼°70.0%£¨14/20£©(¦Ö2=3.337£¬P=0.068)¡£³¬Éù΢¸Æ»¯Õï¶ÏÈéÏÙ°©µÄÒõÐÔÔ¤²âֵΪ77.3%£¨17/22£©¡£Êõºó²¢·¢Ö¢°üÀ¨´©´Ì²¿Î»ÉøÑª1Àý£¬Æ¤ÏÂðö°ß4Àý¡£Ëæ·Ãʱ¼ä6¡«26¸öÔ£¬Æ½¾ù13¸öÔ¡£19ÀýÈéÏÙ°©¾ùÎÞ¸´·¢£¬23ÀýÁ¼ÐÔ»¼ÕßÇпÚÓúºÏÁ¼ºÃ£¬Èé·¿Íâ¹ÛÂúÒ⣬δ·¢ÏÖ¶ñÐÔÖ×Áö¡£½áÂÛîâ°ÐÄÜ·¢ÏÖ³¬Éù²»ÄÜ·¢ÏÖµÄÈéÏÙ΢¸Æ»¯Ôîâ°Ð¼°³¬Éù·¢ÏÖµÄÈéÏÙ΢¸Æ»¯ÔîÔÚÈéÏÙ°©µÄÕï¶ÏÖÐÓÐÖØÒª¼ÛÖµ£¬VABÕï¶ÏÈéÏÙ΢¸Æ»¯×¼È·£¬Î¢´´£¬Êõºó²¢·¢Ö¢ÉÙ¡£
Abstract:
ObjectiveTo evaluate the clinical value of image-guided vacuum-assisted breast biopsy in the diagnosis of breast microcalcifications. MethodsFrom December 2012 to August 2014, image-guided vacuum-assisted breast biopsy was used in 42 patients with breast microcalcifications diagnosed by mammography. According to American College of Radiology Breast Imaging-Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS), there were 5 cases of BI-RADS category 3, 34 cases of BI-RADS category 4, and 3 cases of BI-RADS category 5. During breast biopsy, 31 were guided by mammography and 11 were guided by ultrasound. ResultsIn the 42 patients, calcium was visualized by an X-ray of the biopsy specimen, and calcification was reported histopathologically. Twenty-four lesions appeared as clustered calcifications were completely removed, and 2 lesions appeared as clustered calcifications and other lesions were partly removed. Pathological diagnosis showed 13 cases of ductal carcinoma in situ, 5 cases of infiltrating ductal carcinoma, 1 case of infiltrating lobular carcinoma, and 23 cases of benign lesions. All the patients diagnosed as breast cancer received operation. The positive predictive values of microcalcifications detected by mammography and by ultrasound in the diagnosis of breast cancer were 45.2% (19/42) and 70.0% (14/20), respectively (¦Ö2=3.337,P=0.068). The negative predictive value of microcalcifications detected by ultrasound in the diagnosis of breast cancer was 77.3% (17/22). One patient suffered bleeding at puncture site, and ecchymosis was observed in 4 patients. The average follow-up period was 13 months (range, 6-26 months). No recurrence was found in 19 breast cancer patients. Among the 23 patients with benign lesions, the incision healed well, the appearance of breast was satisfactory, and no signs of malignancy were seen.ConlusionsMammography can detect breast microcalcifations that can¡¯t be detected by ultrasound. Breast microcalcifations detected by mammography and ultrasound has great value in the diagnosis of breast cancer. Image-guided vacuum-assisted breast biopsy is accurate, minimally invasive, and safe in the diagnosis of breast microcalcifications.

²Î¿¼ÎÄÏ×/References:

[1]Penco S,Rizzo S,Bozzini AC,et al.Stereotactic vacuumª²assisted breast biopsy is not a therapeutic procedure even when all mammographically found calcifications are removed: analysis of 4086 procedures.AJR Am J Roentgenol,2010,195(5):1255-1260.
[2]Burnside ES,Ochsner JE,Fowler KJ,et al.Use of microcalcification descriptors in BIª²RADS 4th edition to stratify risk of malignancy.Radiology,2007,242(2):388-395.
[3]Kettritz U.Minimally Invasive Biopsy Methodsª²Diagnostics or Therapy? Personal Opinion and Review of the Literature.Breast Care (Basel),2011,6(2):94-97.
[4]Huang PC,Cheung YC,Lo YF,et al.A comparison of springª²loaded and vacuumª²assisted techniques for stereotactic breast biopsy of impalpable microcalcification lesions:experience at Chang Gung Memorial Hospital at Linkou.Chang Gung Med J,2011,34(1):75-83.
[5]Kim HS,Kim MJ,Kim EK,et al.USª²guided vacuumª²assisted biopsy of microcalcifications in breast lesions and longª²term followª²up results.Korean J Radiol,2008,9(6):503-509.
[6]Cho N,Moon WK,Cha JH,et al.Ultrasoundª²guided vacuumª²assisted biopsy of microcalcifications detected at screening mammography.Acta Radiol,2009,50(6):602-609.
[7]Hahn SY,Shin JH,Han BK,et al.Sonographicallyª²guided vacuumª²assisted biopsy with digital mammographyª²guided skin marking of suspicious breast microcalcifications:comparison of outcomes with stereotactic biopsy in Asian women.Acta Radiol,2011,52(1):29-34.
[8]Cho N,Moon WK,Chang JM,et al.Ultrasonographyª²guided vacuumª²assisted biopsy of microcalcifications:Comparison of the diagnostic yield of calcified cores and nonª²calcified cores on specimen radiographs.Acta Radiol,2010,51(2):123-127.
[9]O¡¯Flynn EA,Wilson AR,Michell MJ.Imageª²guided breast biopsy:stateª²ofª²theª²art.Clin Radiol,2010,65(4):259-270.
[10]Jackman RJ,Rodriguezª²Soto J.Breast microcalcifications:retrieval failure at prone stereotactic core and vacuum breast biopsyª²frequency,causes,and outcome.Radiology,2006,239(1):61-70.
[11]Berg WA,Arnoldus CL,Teferra E,et al.Biopsy of amorphous breast calcifications: pathologic outcome and yield at stereotactic biopsy.Radiology,2001,221(2):495-503.
[12]G¨¹m¨¹ ÿðþ ‰D H,G¨¹m¨¹ ÿðþ ‰D M,Devalia H,et al.Causes of failure in removing calcium in microcalcificationª²only lesions using 11ª²gauge stereotactic vacuumª²assisted breast biopsy.Diagn Interv Radiol,2012,18(4):354-359.
[13]Àîæº£¬³ÂÀ¤£¬¶¡ºìÓî.³¬Éù¡°Ó©»ð³æ¡±¼¼ÊõÔÚÈéÏÙÖ×ÁöÕï¶ÏÓë¼ø±ðÕï¶ÏÖÐÓ¦ÓüÛÖµ³õ̽.ҽѧӰÏñѧÔÓÖ¾,2011,21(6):857-859.
[14]Yi J,Lee EH,Kwak JJ,et al.Retrieval rate and accuracy of ultrasoundª²guided 14ª²G semiª²automated core needle biopsy of breast microcalcifications.Korean J Radiol,2014,15(1):12-19.
[15]Lee SH,Kim EK,Kim MJ,et al.Vacuumª²assisted breast biopsy under ultrasonographic guidance: analysis of a 10ª²year experience.Ultrasonography,2014,33(4):259-266.
[16]Agacayak F,Ozturk A,Bozdogan A,et al.Stereotactic vacuumª²assisted core biopsy results for nonª²palpable breast lesions.Asian Pac J Cancer Prev,2014,15(13):5171-5174.
[17]Park HL,Hong J.Vacuumª²assisted breast biopsy for breast cancer.Gland Surg,2014,3(2):120-127.

±¸×¢/Memo

±¸×¢/Memo:
*ͨѶ×÷Õߣ¬E-mail£ºhlpsurg@sina.com
¸üÐÂÈÕÆÚ/Last Update: 2015-06-20