[1]张永康 王玉珍 杜明国 廖晓锋*.腹腔镜阑尾切除术阑尾残端荷包缝合包埋与Hemolok的比较[J].中国微创外科杂志,2014,14(6):512-515.
　Zhang Yongkang,Wang Yuzhen,Du Mingguo,et al.A Comparison of Pursestring Suture and Hemolok Ligation in Securing of the Base of the Appendix in Laparoscopic Appendectomy[J].Chinese Journal of Minimally Invasive Surgery,2014,14(6):512-515.
点击复制

腹腔镜阑尾切除术阑尾残端荷包缝合包埋与Hemolok的比较()
分享到：

《中国微创外科杂志》[ISSN:1009-6604/CN:11-4526/R]

卷:
14
期数:
2014年6期
页码:
512-515
栏目:
出版日期:
2014-06-20

文章信息/Info

Title:
A Comparison of Pursestring Suture and Hemolok Ligation in Securing of the Base of the Appendix in Laparoscopic Appendectomy
作者:
张永康 王玉珍 杜明国 廖晓锋*
湖北文理学院附属襄阳市中心医院普外三科，襄阳441021
Author(s):
Zhang Yongkang;  Wang Yuzhen;  Du Mingguo;  et al. Corresponding author:Liao Xiaofeng; Email：xfliao@medmail.com.cn
Department of General Surgery, Xiangyang Central Hospital, Xiangyang 441021, China
关键词:
阑尾残端; 腹腔镜阑尾切除术
Keywords:
Appendix stump; Laparoscopic appendectomy
分类号:
R656.8
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
目的探讨荷包缝合包埋阑尾残端在腹腔镜阑尾切除术中的应用价值。方法2010年6月~2013年6月因急慢性阑尾炎行腹腔镜阑尾切除术101例，采用2种不同方法处理阑尾残端：50例阑尾根部行丝线结扎后，荷包缝合包埋残端（包埋组）；51例用Hemolok夹闭阑尾根部后，不再进一步处理阑尾残端（Hemolok组），比较2组手术时间和术后患者恢复情况。结果2组术后并发症、术后住院时间无显著性差异（P>0.05)。包埋组手术时间（55.8±5.8）min，明显长于Hemolok组（44.8±5.7）min（t=9.613，P=0.000）；包埋组手术费用（5086±58）元，显著少于Hemolok组（5430±50）元（t=-31.945，P=0.000）。结论2种处理阑尾残端的方法都是安全、有效的，但荷包缝合包埋阑尾残端更符合传统阑尾切除术的手术操作要求，对术者腹腔镜操作水平要求较高，但节省手术费用。Hemolok夹闭阑尾根部节省手术时间，操作简单，更适合于初学者。
Abstract:
ObjectiveTo compare pursestring suture and Hemolok ligation in securing of the base of the appendix in laparoscopic appendectomy.MethodsFrom June 2010 to June 2013, there were 101 patients undergoing laparoscopic appendectomy in our hospital. They were treated by two different methods in securing of the base of the appendix: silk ligation of the stump and pursestring suture embedment was performed in 50 cases (embedment group); while stump ligation by using Hemolok clips was performed in 51 cases (Hemolok group). Two groups were compared in operation time and postoperative patient recovery.ResultsBetween the both groups, postoperative complications and postoperative hospital stay had no significant differences (P>005). The operation time of the embedment group (55.8±5.8) min was significantly longer than that of the Hemolok group (448±5.7) min (t=9.613, P=0.000). The hospitalization expenditure of the embedment group (5086±58) yuan was significantly less than that of the Hemolok group (5430±50) yuan (t=-31.945, P=0.000).ConclusionsBoth methods are safe and effective in securing of the base of the appendix in laparoscopic appendectomy. Pursestring suture embedment is more in line with traditional appendectomy requirements and cost effective, but requiring more skilled laparoscopic manipulation. Hemolok clipping of the appendix saves operation time and is easy to perform, which is more suitable for beginners.

参考文献/References:

[1]Semm K.Endoscopic appendectomy.Endoscopy,1983,15(2):59-64.
[2]吴在德，吴肇汉，主编.外科学.第7版.北京：人民卫生出版社，2012.467-472.
[3]王国胜，孙辉，刘明发.腹腔镜阑尾切除术115例.中国微创外科杂志,2009,9（1）：91.
[4]Wei HB, Huang JL, Zheng ZH, et al. Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy: a prospective randomized comparison. Surg Endosc,2009,24(2):266-269.
[5]Kazemier G, Hofint K, Saad S, et al. Securing the appendiceal stump in laparoscopic appendectomy: evidence for routine stapling.Surg Endosc,2006,20(9):1473-76.
[6]张光永，李波.腹腔镜手术体内留置钛夹对机体的影响.腹腔镜外科杂志,2003,8（2）：118-120．
[7]吴国忠,杨敖霖．腹腔镜胆囊切除术后钛夹致十二指肠穿孔一例.中华普通外科杂志，2004,19（4）：213.
[8]朱应昌,梁伟潮,陈烈欢,等.改良小操作孔无钛夹腹腔镜阑尾切除术103例.实用医学杂志,2010,26（14）：2592-2593.
[9]Schick KS, Huttl TP, Fertmann JM, et al. A critical analysis of laparoscopic appendectomy: how experience with 1,400 appendectomies allowed innovative treatment to become standard in a university hospital. World J Surg,2008,32(7):1406-1413.
[10]张星，陈文忠，华科俊.腹腔镜阑尾切除术阑尾根部3种处理方法的比较.中国微创外科杂志,2013,13（2）：139-141.
[11]张永康,刘韵,廖晓锋,等.不同类型阑尾炎腹腔镜和开腹手术临床比较.海南医学,2011,22(11):88-90.
[12]王有利,刘凡,叶颖江,等.腹腔镜阑尾切除术在急性和慢性阑尾炎中应用疗效的比较.中华普通外科杂志,2013,28(2):93-95.
[13]Street D，Bodai BI, Owens LJ, et al. Simple ligation vs stump in version in appendectomy. Arch Surg,1998,123(4):689-690.
[14]曹其彬，耿全利，刘智,等.单孔腹腔镜阑尾切除术69例分析.中华普通外科手术学杂志（电子版），2010,4（3）：59-60.
[15]林增煊，林洪堂，林长国,等.腹腔镜阑尾切除术50例报告.中华普通外科手术学杂志（电子版）,2012,6（2）：59-60.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
*通讯作者，Email：xfliao@medmail.com.cn
更新日期/Last Update: 2014-12-08