[1]成军 陈涛 李铮 李小刚 廖晓锋*.金属支架置入联合腹腔镜手术治疗左半结肠癌、直肠癌梗阻[J].中国微创外科杂志,2014,14(6):506-508.
　Cheng Jun,Chen Tao,Li Zheng,et al.Laparoscopic Surgery Combined with Colon Bracket Insertion for Cancerous Obstruction of Left Hemicolon and Rectum[J].Chinese Journal of Minimally Invasive Surgery,2014,14(6):506-508.
点击复制

金属支架置入联合腹腔镜手术治疗左半结肠癌、直肠癌梗阻()
分享到：

《中国微创外科杂志》[ISSN:1009-6604/CN:11-4526/R]

卷:
14
期数:
2014年6期
页码:
506-508
栏目:
出版日期:
2014-06-20

文章信息/Info

Title:
Laparoscopic Surgery Combined with Colon Bracket Insertion for Cancerous Obstruction of Left Hemicolon and Rectum
作者:
成军 陈涛 李铮 李小刚 廖晓锋*
湖北文理学院附属襄阳市中心医院普外三科，襄阳441021
Author(s):
Cheng Jun;  Chen Tao;  Li Zheng;  et al.Corresponding author:Liao Xiaofeng; Email：xfliao@medmail.com.cn
Department of General Surgery, Xiangyang Central Hospital, Xiangyang 441021, China
关键词:
左半结肠癌; 直肠癌; 梗阻; 支架; 腹腔镜
Keywords:
Leftsided colon cancer; Rectal cancer; Intestinal obstruction; Stent; Laparoscope
分类号:
R735
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
目的探讨左半结肠癌、直肠癌梗阻患者支架置入后腹腔镜手术的安全性和可行性。方法2009年3月~2013年4月43例左半结肠癌、直肠癌梗阻根据患者及家属意愿选择手术方式，分为支架联合腹腔镜手术25例（支架腹腔镜组），术中大肠灌洗一期切除吻合术18例(一期吻合组），比较2组手术时间、住院时间、术中出血量、吻合口漏、切口感染、腹腔感染等。结果支架腹腔镜组术中出血量(40.5±20.1)ml，明显少于一期吻合组（280.8±20.6）ml(t=-38.277，P=0000)；手术时间（135.2±25.4）min，明显短于一期吻合组（240.4±30.5）min(t=-12.317，P=0.000)；吻合口漏0例，显著少于一期吻合组4例（Fisher’s检验，P=0.025)；切口感染0例，显著少于一期吻合组8例（Fisher’s检验，P=0.000)；腹腔感染0例，显著少于一期吻合组6例（Fisher’s检验，P=0.003)；住院时间（19.5±3.3）d与一期吻合组（20.2±8.5)d无明显差异（t=0.376，P=0.709)。2组患者术后6~12个月随访，恢复良好，无吻合口复发。结论左半结肠癌、直肠癌梗阻患者支架置入后7~10 d腹腔镜手术安全可行，术后恢复快，并发症少。
Abstract:
ObjectiveTo study the safety and feasibility of laparoscopic surgery after colon bracket insertion in the treatment of cancerous obstruction of left hemicolon and rectum. MethodsA total of 43 cases of obstructing leftsided colon cancer or rectal cancer from March 2009 to April 2013 were reviewed. According to patients’ preference, all the cases were divided into two groups: 25 cases received laparoscopic surgery 7-10 days after the placement of the selfexpanding metal stent (laparoscopic group), while 18 cases were treated by onestage radical colon resection after colon irrigation (open group)．The operative time, the length of hospital stay, blood loss, anastomotic leakage, wound infection, and abdominal infection were compared between the two groups.ResultsThe laparoscopic group had significantly less intraoperative blood loss ［(40.5±20.1) ml vs. (280.8±20.6) ml, t=-38.277, P=0.000］, shorter operation time ［(135.2±25.4) min vs. (240.4±30.5) min, t=-12.317, P=0.000］, fewer anastomotic leakage (0 case vs. 4 cases, Fisher’s test,P=0.025), fewer wound infection (0 case vs. 8 cases,Fisher’s test, P=0.000), and fewer abdominal infection (0 case vs. 6 cases,Fisher’s test, P=0.003) than those of the open group. No significant difference was detected in the hospital stay between the two groups ［(19.5±3.3) d vs. (20.2±8.5) d, t=0.376, P=0.709］. Both the groups were followed up for 6-12 months after operation. None of the patients showed postoperative anastomotic recurrence. ConclusionLaparoscopic surgery 7-10 days after colon bracket insertion is effective and safe, having quick postoperative recovery and less complications.

参考文献/References:

[1]Engledow AH, BondSmith G, Motson RW, et al. Treatment of leftside colonic emergencies: a comparison of US and UK surgical practices. Colorect Dis，2009,11(6）：642-647.
[2]孙淑明，吴利标，陈淑贞，等.术中结肠灌洗在治疗左半结肠癌性梗阻的肠道内细菌学的研究.中华胃肠外科杂志，2004,7(4):292-294.
[3]Yin S, Wang ZY, Shi LC, et al. Surgical treatment of large bowel obstruction caused by colorectal carcinoma. Chin J Pract Surg,2001,21(2):100-101.
[4]Ngke A, Law WL, Leeym M, et al. Selfexpanding metallic stent as a bridge to surgery versus emergency resection for obstructing leftsided colorectal cancer :a casematched study. Gastrointest Surg,2006,10(3):798-803.
[5]Keymling M. Colorectal stenting.Endoscopy,2003,35(3）:234-238.
[6]陆维祺,赵纲,童汉兴,等.肠镜与腹腔镜联合治疗急性恶性左半结肠梗阻2例报告.中国微创外科杂志,2008,8(12):1088-1099.
[7]崔建,张建立,王松,等.支架联合腹腔镜手术治疗梗阻性左半结肠癌的初步探讨.中华胃肠外科杂志，2011,14(1):40-43.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
*通讯作者，Email：xfliao@medmail.com.cn
更新日期/Last Update: 2014-12-08