[1]朱江① 康骅** 海涛 梁阔 王亚军.腔镜腋窝淋巴结清扫与传统腋窝淋巴结清扫对保乳手术美容效果影响的比较[J].中国微创外科杂志,2014,14(6):498-502.
　Zhu Jiang,Kang Hua*,Hai Tao*,et al.A Comparison of Cosmetic Outcomes between Endoscopic Axillary Lymph Node Dissection and Conventional Axillary Lymph Node Dissection for Breast Conservative Surgery[J].Chinese Journal of Minimally Invasive Surgery,2014,14(6):498-502.
点击复制

腔镜腋窝淋巴结清扫与传统腋窝淋巴结清扫对保乳手术美容效果影响的比较()
分享到：

《中国微创外科杂志》[ISSN:1009-6604/CN:11-4526/R]

卷:
14
期数:
2014年6期
页码:
498-502
栏目:
出版日期:
2014-06-20

文章信息/Info

Title:
A Comparison of Cosmetic Outcomes between Endoscopic Axillary Lymph Node Dissection and Conventional Axillary Lymph Node Dissection for Breast Conservative Surgery
作者:
朱江① 康骅** 海涛 梁阔 王亚军
首都医科大学宣武医院普外科，北京100053
Author(s):
Zhu Jiang;  Kang Hua*;  Hai Tao*;  et al.Corresponding author:Kang Hua; Email：kanghua@xwh.ccmu.edu.cn
*Department of General Surgery, Xuanwu Hospital of Capital Medical University, Beijing 100053, China
关键词:
乳腺癌; 保乳手术; 腔镜腋窝淋巴结清扫; 美容效果
Keywords:
Breast cancer; Breast conserving surgery; Endoscopic axillary lymph node dissection; Cosmetic outcome
分类号:
R737.9
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
目的探讨腔镜腋窝淋巴结清扫在乳腺癌保乳手术中的美容效果。方法2007年1月~2009年12月保乳手术中行腔镜腋窝淋巴结清扫术29例（EALND组），并与同期33例传统腋窝淋巴结清扫（CALND组）进行比较,根据调查问卷和术后6个月以上站立位乳房照片评价术后乳房的美容效果。结果EALND组无中转开放手术，未发生意外损伤、皮下气肿、脂肪栓塞等并发症。EALND组清扫腋窝淋巴结（18.2±5.9）枚，显著多于CALND组（14.9±3.6）枚（t=2.694，P=0009）。平均随访时间49.2月（36～69个月）。EALND组主观满意度优良率89.7%（26/29），明显高于CALND组69.7%（23/33；Z=-2.509，P=0.012）；EALND组美容效果客观评分优良率86.2%（25/29），明显高于CALND组75.8%（25/33；Z=-2.295，P=0.022）。结论腔镜腋窝淋巴结清扫术不仅能够达到传统腋窝淋巴清扫的治疗效果，而且具有缩小手术切口、改善保乳手术后乳房美容效果等优点。
Abstract:
ObjectiveTo evaluate the cosmetic outcomes of endoscopic axillary lymph node dissection (EALND) in breast conserving surgery (BCS).MethodsA total of 31 patients who received BCS and EALND from January 2007 to December 2009 were enrolled as EALND group, whereas 35 patients who underwent conventional axillary lymph node dissection (CALND) in the same period were selected as CALND group. Clinical data of the patients were analyzed retrospectively. The data were gathered by using a questionnaire including patients’ cosmetic scores and satisfaction. Postoperative breasts photographs were evaluated by using physician cosmetic scores. ResultsIn the EALND group, there were no complications such as accidential injury, subcutaneous emphysema, or fat embolism, without conversion to open surgery. The number of lymph node dissected was significantly more in the EALND group (18.2±5.9) than that in the CALND group (14.9±3.6) (t=2.694, P=0.009). The mean duration of followup was 49.2 months (range, 36-69 months). The EALND group showed a higher patient satisfaction ［89.7%(26/29) vs. 69.7%(23/33),Z=-2.509, P=0.012］ and a higher cosmetic scores ［86.2%(25/29), vs. 75.8%(25/33), Z=-2.295, P=0.022］ than those of the CALND group. ConclusionEALND has the same therapeutic results but significantly smaller incision and better cosmetic outcomes compared with CALND.

参考文献/References:

[1]Maunsell E, Brisson J, Deschenes L. Arm problems and psychological distress after surgery for breast cancer. Can J Surg,1993,36:315-320.
[2]Warmuth MA, Bowen G, Prosnitz LR, et a1.Complications of axillary lymph node dissection for carcinoma of the breast: a report based on a patient survey.Cancer,1998,83:1362-1368.
[3]Saimura M, Mitsuyama S, Anan K, et al. Endoscopyassisted breastconserving surgery for early breast cancer. Asian J Endosc Surg,2013,6:203-208.
[4]AponteRueda ME，Saade Cárdenas RA，Saade Aure MJ． Endoscopic axillary dissection: a systematic review of the literature. Breast,2009,18（3）:150-158.
[5]海涛,康骅,梁阔,等．56例乳腺癌内腔镜腋窝淋巴结清扫的临床分析.首都医科大学学报,2008,29:377-380.
[6]丁波泥,李小荣,陈道瑾,等.乳腺癌乳腔镜腋窝淋巴结清扫术与常规手术的比较.中国微创外科杂志,2010,10:1063-1065.
[7]Fisher B, Anderson S, Bryant J,et al. Twentyyear followup of a randomized trial comparing total mastectomy, lumpectomy, and lumpectomy plus irradiation for the treatment of invasive breast cancer. N Engl J Med,2002,347:1233-1241.
[8]Margenthaler JA. Optimizing conservative breast surgery. J Surg Oncol,2011,103:306-312.
[9]康骅,朱江,海涛,等.乳房整形技术在乳腺癌保乳手术中的应用体会.中国普外基础与临床杂志,2011,18:917-921.
[10]Samphao S, Eremin JM, ElSheemy M, et al. Management of the axilla in women with breast cancer: current clinical practice and a new selective targeted approach. Ann Surg Oncol,2008,15:1282-1296.
[11]Salvat J, Knopf JF, Ayoubi JM, et al. Endoscopic exploration and lymph node sampling of the axillary. Preliminary findings of a randomized pilot study comparing clinical and anatomopathologic results of endoscopic axillary lymph node sampling with traditional surgical treatment. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol,1996,70:165-173.
[12]Gomatos IP, Filippakis G, Albanopoulos K, et al. Complete endoscopic axillary lymph node dissection without liposuction for breast cancer: initial experience and midterm outcome. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech,2006,16:232-236.
[13]Langer I, Kocher T, Guller U, et al. Longterm outcomes of breast cancer patients after endoscopic axillary lymph node dissection: a prospective analysis of 52 patients. Breast Cancer Res Treat,2005,90:85-91.
[14]Toikka JO, Laine H, Ahotupa M, et al. Increased arterial intimamedia thickness and in vivo LDL oxidation in young men with borderline hypertension. Hypertension,2000,36:929-933.
[15]骆成玉.乳腔镜在乳腺癌治疗中的应用与评价.中国实用外科杂志,2006,26:309-311.
[16]Tagaya N, Kubota K. Experience with endoscopic axillary lymphadenectomy using needlescopic instruments in patients with breast cancer:a preliminary report.Surg Endosc,2002,16:307-309.
[17]梁阔，康骅，海涛,等.电视内腔镜在乳腺癌腋窝淋巴结清扫的应用.现代肿瘤医学,2007,15:1598-1600.
[18]Clark J, Leff DR, Sodergren M, et al. Singleincision transumbilical levels 1 and 2 axillary lymph node dissection using a flexible endoscope in human cadaveric models. Surg Endosc,2013,27:478-486.
[19]骆成玉.微创功能治疗：乳腺外科临床实践的必然选择.中华腔镜外科杂志,2011,4:430-438.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
*基金项目：北京卫生系统高层次卫生技术人才学科带头人培养项目(项目编号：2011-2-28)**通讯作者，Email：kanghua@xwh.ccmu.edu.cn①（北京市平谷区医院普外科，北京101200）
更新日期/Last Update: 2014-12-08