[1]李潇娴,朱江帆,忻颖.不同人群对胆囊切除手术方式的选择[J].中国微创外科杂志,2012,12(7):644-649.
 Li Xiaoxian,Zhu Jiangfan,Xin Ying..Population Preferences for Various Approaches of Cholecystectomy[J].Chinese Journal of Minimally Invasive Surgery,2012,12(7):644-649.
点击复制

不同人群对胆囊切除手术方式的选择()
分享到:

《中国微创外科杂志》[ISSN:1009-6604/CN:11-4526/R]

卷:
12
期数:
2012年7期
页码:
644-649
栏目:
论著
出版日期:
2012-07-20

文章信息/Info

Title:
Population Preferences for Various Approaches of Cholecystectomy
作者:
李潇娴朱江帆忻颖
同济大学附属东方医院微创外科,上海200120
Author(s):
Li Xiaoxian Zhu Jiangfan Xin Ying.
Department of Minimally Invasive Surgery, East Hospital, Tongji Univercity, Shanghai 200120, China
关键词:
经脐入路内镜手术经自然腔道内镜手术腹腔镜胆囊切除术人群选择
Keywords:
Transumbilical endoscopic surgeryNatural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgeryLaparoscopyCholecystectomyPopulation preferences
分类号:
R657.4
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
目的研究不同人群对不同胆囊切除手术方式的选择,明确患者对新技术的需求,从而能够据此结果进行相关的临床试验、手术训练以及技术、器械的革新。方法2010年6月~2011年3月,在不同人群中进行无记名问卷调查,将开腹手术(open surgery,OS)、腹腔镜手术(laparoscopic sugery,LS)、经脐内镜手术(transumbilical endoscopic surgery,TUES)、经自然腔道内镜手术(natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery,NOTES)4种胆囊切除手术方式供医生、护士、住院患者选择。结果200份问卷中,有效问卷198份。其中患者128人(65%),医生及护士各35人(18%)。LS是最受欢迎的术式,被96人(48%)接受,其次是TUES 84人(42%),只有12人(6%)选择NOTES,6人(3%)选择开腹手术。结论LS作为胆囊切除的“金标准”,较之传统开腹手术,已被大多数人接受。目前新兴的TUES胆囊切除术,由于美观等因素,更易为女性、年轻人欢迎。由于安全性、可行性及其他潜在因素,NOTES尚难以被患者所接受。
Abstract:
ObjectiveTo evaluate population perception of various ways of cholecystectomy, so that to understand patients’ demands, which is a base for further clinical trials, surgical training, and innovation of technology and equipment. MethodsSince June 2010 through March 2011, an anonymous questionnaire was given to patients, doctors and nurses, who were requested to select the preferred approach among open surgery (OS), laparoscopic surgery (LS), transumbilical endoscopic surgery (TUES), and natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (NOTES). ResultsTotally 198 questionnaires were valid among the 200, including 128 from patients (65%), and 35 (18%) from doctors and nurses. LS was the most popular approach, which was accepted by 96 people (49%), followed by TUES, chosen by 84 people (42%). Only 12 people (6%) chose NOTES, and six people (3%) chose OS. ConclusionsAs the “gold standard”, LS has been accepted by most people. TUES, as a new technology, is accepted by female and young people, due to its good cosmetic outcomes. NOTES is still not an ideal option for safety, feasibility and other potential reasons.

参考文献/References:

[1]Romanelli JR,Earle DB.Singleport laparoscopic surgery:an overview.Surg Endosc,2009,23:1419-1427.
[2]Box G,Averch T,Cadeddu J,et al.Nomenclature of natural orifice translumenal endoscopic surgery (NOTES) and laparoendoscopic singlesite surgery (LESS) procedures in urology.J Endourol,2008,22:2575-2581.
[3]Zhu JF.Which term is better:SILS,SPA,LESS,ENOTES,or TUES?Surg Endosc,2009,23:1164-1165.
[4]朱江帆.经脐入路内镜手术最新进展.中国微创外科杂志,2010,10(11):964-966.
[5]Barret E,SanchezSalas R,Ercolani MC,et al.Natural orifice transendoluminal surgery and laparoendoscopic singlesite surgery:the future of laparoscopic radical prostatectomy.Future Oncol,2011,7:427-434.
[6]Gettman MT,White WM,Aron M,et al.Where do we really stand with LESS and NOTES?Eur Urol,2011,59:231-234.
[7]Rane A,Autorino R.Robotic natural orifice translumenal endoscopic surgery and laparoendoscopic singlesite surgery:current status.Curr Opin Urol,2011,21:71-77.
[8]Bucher P,Pugin F,Buchs NC,et al.Randomized clinical trial of laparoendoscopic singlesite versus conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy.Br J Surg,2011,98:1695-1702.
[9]Connor S.Singleportaccess cholecystectomy:history should not be allowed to repeat.World J Surg,2009,33:1020-1021.
[10]Moris DN,Bramis KJ,Mantonakis EI,et al.Surgery via natural orifices in human beings:yesterday,today,tomorrow.Am J Surg,2011 Dec 27. [Epub ahead of print]
[11]Finkelberg D,Wassef W.Natural orifice translumenal surgery: from scales to symphonies.Cur Opin Gas,2008,24:674-681.
[12]Horgan S,Cullen J,Talamini M,et al.Natural orifice surgery: initial clinical experience.Surg Endosc,2009,23(7):1512-1518.
[13]Horgan S,Mintz Y,Jacobsen GR,et al.Video.NOTES:transvaginal cholecystectomy with assisting articulating instruments.Surg Endosc,2009,23(8):1900.
[14]Canes D,Desai M,Aron M,et al.Transumbilical singleport surgery:evolution and current status.Eur Urol,2008,54:1020-1030.
[15]Bass EB,Pitt HA,Lillemoe KD.Costeffectiveness of laparoscopic cholecystectomy versus open cholecystectomy.Am J Surg,1993,165:466-471.
[16]Lam C,Murray F,Cuschieri A.Increased cholecystectomy rate after the introduction of laparoscopic cholecystectomy in Scotland.Gut,1996,38:282-284.
[17]Otten AL.The influence of the mass media on health policy.Health Aff (Millwood),1992,11:111-118.
[18]Bucher P,Pugin F,Ostermann S,et al.Population perception of surgical safety and body image trauma:a plea for scarless surgery?Surg Endosc,2011,25:408-415.
[19]Lichten JB,Reid JJ,Zahalsky MP,et al.Laparoscopic cholecystectomy in the new millennium.Surg Endosc,2001,15:867-872.
[20]Chauhan A,Mehrotra M,Bhatia PK,et al.Day care laparoscopic cholecystectomy:a feasibility study in a public health service hospital in a developing country.World J Surg,2006,30:1690-1695.
[21]Rao A,Kynaston J,MacDonald ER,et al.Patient preferences for surgical techniques:should we invest in new approaches?Surg Endosc,2010,24:3016-3025.
[22]Tomikawa M,Xu H,Hashizume M.Current status and prerequisites for natural orifice translumenal endoscopic surgery (NOTES).Surg Today,2010,40:909-916.
[23]Varadarajulu S,Tamhane A,Drelichman ER.Patient perception of natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery as a technique for
cholecystectomy.Gastrointest Endosc,2008,67:854-860.
[24]Swanstrom L,VoLSkmann E,Hungness E,et al.Patient attitudes and expectations regarding natural orifice translumenal endoscopic surgery.Surg Endosc Inter Tech,2009,23:1519-1525.
[25]Li W,Xu H,Wang ZK,et al.Natural orifice translumenal endoscopic surgery (NOTES):patients’ perceptions and attitudes.Dig Dis Sci,2011,56:2415-2422.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
基金项目:浦东新区重点发展学科项目资助(PWZxk2010-07)朱江帆通讯作者,Email:zhujiangfan@hotmail.com
更新日期/Last Update: 2013-04-03