[1]李海冰,刘志强,陶怡怡,等.脑电双频指数用于门诊宫腔镜通液术麻醉监测的价值[J].中国微创外科杂志,2011,11(11):1015-1018.
　Li Haibing,Liu Zhiqiang,Tao Yiyi,et al.The Value of Anesthesia Montoring by Bispectral Index during Hysteroscopic Hydrotubation in Outpatient[J].Chinese Journal of Minimally Invasive Surgery,2011,11(11):1015-1018.
点击复制

脑电双频指数用于门诊宫腔镜通液术麻醉监测的价值()
分享到：

《中国微创外科杂志》[ISSN:1009-6604/CN:11-4526/R]

卷:
11
期数:
2011年11期
页码:
1015-1018
栏目:
出版日期:
2011-11-20

文章信息/Info

Title:
The Value of Anesthesia Montoring by Bispectral Index during Hysteroscopic Hydrotubation in Outpatient
作者:
李海冰; 刘志强; 陶怡怡; 马馨霞
同济大学附属第一妇婴保健院麻醉科，上海200040
Author(s):
Li Haibing;  Liu Zhiqiang;  Tao Yiyi;  et al.
Department of Anesthesiology, Shanghai First Maternity and Infant Hospital,Affiliated to Tongji University, Shanghai 200040, China
关键词:
脑电双频指数; 麻醉; 宫腔镜; 输卵管通液
Keywords:
Electroencephalograph; Anesthesia; Hysteroscopy; Hydrotubation
分类号:
R614.2+4
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
目的观察脑电双频指数(bispectral index，BIS)监测对门诊宫腔镜通液术患者麻醉过程及恢复的意义。方法2010年10月~2011年3月选择我院门诊择期在丙泊酚-舒芬太尼静脉麻醉下行宫腔镜通液术120例，按随机数字表随机分为BIS监测组（n=60）与常规监测组（n=60）。静脉给予舒芬太尼5 μg、丙泊酚1.0 mg/kg负荷量后，丙泊酚维持量BIS监测组根据BIS（40~55）调节，常规监测组仅根据患者临床体征调节。比较2组丙泊酚用量、术中反应、手术时间及留院观察时间等。结果BIS监测组丙泊酚用量(84.1±10.7)mg，显著少于常规监测组(108.7±15.3)mg(t=-10.206,P=0000）。扩宫口时肢动，BIS监测组2例，常规监测组7例，2组发生率无统计学差异(χ2=1.922，P=0.166)。常规监测组平均动脉压(MAP)在麻醉诱导入睡后(t=-4379，P=0.000)、扩张宫颈时(t=-5.863，P=0.000)、通液时（t=-3.073,P=0003），显著低于BIS监测组。术中知晓BIS监测组无发生，常规监测组3例，2组发生率无统计学差异(Fisher’s检验，P=0244)。结论BIS监测用于门诊宫腔镜通液术麻醉，预防麻醉药用量不足或逾量，减轻血流动力学改变，有利于提高麻醉安全，减少并发症的发生。
Abstract:
ObjectiveTo evaluate the value of bispectral index (BIS) monitoring for outpatients undergoing hysteroscopic hydrotubation under propofolsufentanil anesthesia. MethodsFrom October 2010 to March 2011, 120 patients who received selective hysteroscopic hydrotubation under propofolsufentanil anesthesia were enrolled in this study. The patients were randomly divided into BIS monitor (n=60) and regular monitor groups (n=60). After administering sufentanil 5 μg plus propofol 1.0 mg/kg, we adjusted the dose of propofol by monitoring BIS (40-55, BIS group), or clinical symptoms (regular group). The dose of propofol, patients’ response during the operation, operation time, and hospital stay were compared between the two groups.ResultsThe dose of propofol in the BIS group was significantly less than the regular group ［(84.1±10.7)mg vs. (108.7±15.3)mg,t=-10.206, P=0.000］. Limbs movement was observed in 2 cases from the BIS group, and 7 from the regular group (χ2=1.922, P=0.166). The MAP in the regular group was significantly lower than that in BIS group after anesthesia (t=-4.379，P=0.000), at the dialation of the cervical os (t=-5.863, P=0.000) and fluid infusion (t=-3.073, P=0.003). Intraoperative awareness occurred none in the BIS group, but 3 in the regular group (Fisher’s test, P=0.244). ConclusionsBIS monitoring can be used during hysteroscopic hydrotubation in outpatient to prevent overdose or shortage of anaesthetics, improve hemodynamic changes, increases surgical safety and decrease the rate of complications.

参考文献/References:

[1]裴丽坚，王波，黄宇光.脑电双频谱指数监测提高麻醉管理及全麻苏醒质量Meta分析研究.中华麻醉学杂志,2006,26（10）：880-882.
[2]Liu N, Chazot T, Huybrechts I, et al. The influence of a muscle relaxant bolus on bispectral and datexohmeda entropy values during propofolremifentanil induced loss of consciousness. Anesth Analg,2005,101:1713-1718.
[3]Fechner J, Hering W, Ihmsen H, et al. Modelling the pharmacodynamic interaction between remifentanil and propofol by EEG controlled dosing. Eur J Anaesthesiol,2003,20(12):373-379.
[4]Kreuer S, Wilhelm W, Grundmann U. Narcotrend index versus bispectral index as electroencephalogrammeasures of anesthetic drug effect during propofol anesthesia.Anesth Analg,2004，98:692-697.
[5]Schneider G, Gelb AW, Schmeller B, et al. Detection of awareness in surgical patients with EEGbased indicesbispectral index and patient state index.Br J Anaesth，2003,91:329-335.
[6]Iannuzzi M, Iannuzzi E, Rossi F, et al.Relationship between bispeet ral index,electroencephalographic state entropy and effectsite EC50 for propofol at different clinical endpoints.Br J Anaesth,2005,94(7):613-616.
[7]Avidan MS, Zhang L, Burnside BA. Anesthesia awareness and the bispectral index. N Engl Med,2008,358:1097-1118.
[8]何绍旋,张芝芳,胥建党.脑电双频指数用于门诊无痛内镜检查的临床研究.临床麻醉学杂志，2004,20（6）：343-345.
[9]Nishiyama T, Matsukawa T, Hanaoka K. Is the ARX index a more sensitive indicator of anesthetic depth than the bispectral index during sevoflurane/nitrous oxide anesthesia? Acta Anaesthesiol Scand,2004,48(11):1028-1032.
[10]赵艳，蒋建渝，张莉萍.舒芬太尼靶控输注诱导时脑电双频指数及血流动力学的变化（前瞻性随机对照研究）.中国微创外科杂志，2007,7（4）：323-326.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
刘志强通讯作者，Email:jinqiliu@sohu.com
更新日期/Last Update: 2013-05-06