[1]蔡俊丰,祝建光,彭庄,等.小切口重建钢板治疗锁骨中段骨折的比较研究[J].中国微创外科杂志,2010,10(9):792-794.
　Cai Junfeng,Zhu Jianguang,Peng Zhuang,et al.Treatment of Midshaft Clavicle Fractures with Reconstructive Plate through Minimal Incision：A Comparison Study[J].Chinese Journal of Minimally Invasive Surgery,2010,10(9):792-794.
点击复制

小切口重建钢板治疗锁骨中段骨折的比较研究()
分享到：

《中国微创外科杂志》[ISSN:1009-6604/CN:11-4526/R]

卷:
10
期数:
2010年9期
页码:
792-794
栏目:
出版日期:
2010-07-01

文章信息/Info

Title:
Treatment of Midshaft Clavicle Fractures with Reconstructive Plate through Minimal Incision：A Comparison Study
作者:
蔡俊丰; 祝建光; 彭庄; 尹峰; 刘林; 袁峰
同济大学附属东方医院骨科,上海200120
Author(s):
Cai Junfeng;  Zhu Jianguang;  Peng Zhuang; et al.
Department of Orthopdeics, Dongfang Hospital, Tongji Medical University, Shanghai 200120, China
关键词:
锁骨中段骨折; 小切口; 重建钢板; 内固定
Keywords:
Midshaft clavicle fracture; Minimal incision; Reconstructive plate; Internal fixation
分类号:
R683.41
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
目的比较小切口与传统切口重建钢板治疗锁骨中段骨折的临床效果。方法2007年3月~2009年5月，采用小切口（05~35 cm）重建钢板治疗15例锁骨中段骨折，与前期2005年8月~2007年3月采用传统切口重建钢板治疗的20例进行比较。手术由同一术者完成，记录每个病例的手术切口长度、手术时间、出血量、术后24 h疼痛评分、骨折愈合时间、术后3个月功能、并发症及病人对切口的满意率，并进行统计分析。结果所有病例均获随访6~18个月，平均13个月。小切口手术在切口长度［（3.5±0.5）cm vs （7.3±1.1）cm，t=-12.540，P=0.000］，出血量［（55.0±10.2）ml vs （95.0±15.7）ml，t=-8.578，P=0000］，术后24 h疼痛评分［（29.0±9.3）分 vs （46.0±9.4）分，t=-5.318，P=0.000］，骨折愈合时间［（9.1±11）周vs （10.8±1.3）周，t=-4.007，P=0.000］及病人对切口的满意率［80%(12/15) vs 25%(5/20)， χ2=10.380，P=0001］方面均明显优于传统切口手术，而手术时间、并发症和术后3个月肩关节功能差异无显著性（P＞0.05）。结论小切口重建钢板治疗锁骨骨折能减小创伤、减少出血、加快骨折愈合，且外形美观，是一种治疗锁骨中段骨折较好的方法，但此种术式对医师的技术要求较高。
Abstract:
ObjectiveTo compare the efficacy of minimal incision with traditional incision in the treatment of midshaft clavicle fractures. MethodsFrom March 2007 to May 2009, totally 15 patients with midshaft clavicle were treated with reconstructive plate though a minimal incision in our hospital. Twenty patients who received the surgery via a traditional incision between August 2005 and March 2007 were set as a control group. All the operations were done by a same group of surgeons. The incision length, operation time, blood loss, 24hour VAS score, bone union time, function recovery 3 months after the surgery, complications, and patients’ satisfaction on the incision were statistically analyzed. ResultsThe patients were followed up for 6-18 months with a mean of 13 months. The minimal incision group had significantly shorter incision length, less operation time and blood loss, lower 24hour VAS score, shorter mean time of bone union, and higher satisfaction rate on the incision ［(3.5±0.5) cm vs (73±1.1) cm, t=-12.540, P=0.000; (55.0±10.2) ml vs (95.0±15.7) ml, t=-8578, P=0.000; (290±9.3) vs (46.0±9.4), t=-5.318, P=0.000; (9.1±1.1) weeks vs (10.8±1.3) weeks, t=-4.007, P=0.000; 80% (12/15) vs 25% (5/20), χ2=10.380, P=0.001］ than the traditional incision group. Whereas, no significant difference was detected between the two groups on operation time, complication rates, and the recovery of shoulder joint function (P>0.05). ConclusionsMinimal incision is a good choice for the treatment of midshaft clavicle fractures with reconstructive plate. The procedure causes less trauma and blood loss, quick recovery, and satisfying cosmetic results. However, the technique is more complicated than traditional method and thus specially trained surgeons are requested.

参考文献/References:

[1]Mckee MD,Kreder HJ,Mandel S,et al.Nonoperative treatment compared with p late fixation of displaced midshaft clavicular fractures.J Bone Joint Surg(Am),2007,89(1):1-10.
[2]张智,李杰,吕明.锁骨中段移位骨折的手术治疗与非手术治疗比较.中国矫形外科杂志,2007,(15)24:1854-1856.
[3]Neer CS.Displaced proximal humeral fracture:Classification and evaluation.J Bone Joint Surg(Am),1970,52(6):1077-1089.
[4]朱求亮,颜茂华,娄云龙,等.锁骨骨折的固定方式选择.实用骨科杂志,2005,(11)2:101-102.
[5]段永壮,何波,徐海斌,等.重建钢板与克氏针治疗锁骨中段骨折的比较研究.生物骨科材料与临床研究,2006,(3)3:19-21.
[6]戴加平,贾少华,李凯.锁骨骨折重建钢板内固定失误分析.中国骨与关节损伤杂志,2006，21（1）：40-41.

更新日期/Last Update: 2013-08-12