[1]徐虎,张春礼,李明全,等.关节镜下射频汽化治疗膝关节骨性关节炎的病例对照研究[J].中国微创外科杂志,2010,10(9):771-773.
　Xu Hu,Zhang Chunli,Li Mingquan,et al.Effect of Radiofrequency in Arthroscopic Debridement on Knee Osteoarthritis: A Casecontrolled Study[J].Chinese Journal of Minimally Invasive Surgery,2010,10(9):771-773.
点击复制

关节镜下射频汽化治疗膝关节骨性关节炎的病例对照研究()
分享到：

《中国微创外科杂志》[ISSN:1009-6604/CN:11-4526/R]

卷:
10
期数:
2010年9期
页码:
771-773
栏目:
出版日期:
2010-07-01

文章信息/Info

Title:
Effect of Radiofrequency in Arthroscopic Debridement on Knee Osteoarthritis: A Casecontrolled Study
作者:
徐虎; 张春礼; 李明全; 裴国献
第四军医大学西京医院骨科研究所，西安710032
Author(s):
Xu Hu;  Zhang Chunli;  Li Mingquan;  et al.
Department of Orthopaedics, Xijing Hospital, Xi’an 710032, China
关键词:
骨性关节炎;  关节镜; 膝关节; 关节清理术; 射频汽化
Keywords:
Osteoarthritis; Arthroscopy; Knee joint; Debridement; Radiofrequency
分类号:
R684
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
目的探讨膝关节骨性关节炎患者行关节镜下清理术中射频汽化的治疗作用。方法2003 年6月～2004年6月在我院行关节镜下清理术应用射频汽化治疗的40例膝骨关节炎为实验组，同期40例关节镜下清理术未应用射频汽化治疗为对照组。手术前、后采用Lysholm评分进行膝关节功能评定。结果实验组术前Lysholm评分为(53.6±6.4)分，术后提高至(83.4±4.7)分 (t=21.549, P=0.000)。对照组术前Lysholm评分为(55.5±5.1)分,术后提高至(79.8±6.1)分 (t=20697, P=0.000)。实验组术后Lysholm评分总分(83.4±4.7)分和疼痛项评分(18.6±3.9)分明显高于对照组（79.8±61）分和（16.6±3.8）分 (t=2.957, P=0.004；t=2.323, P=0.023)，但2组术后力量项评分无显著差异［(6.3±16)分 vs(6.2±1.5)分，t=0.288, P=0.774］。结论关节镜下清理术中应用射频汽化可明显改善膝关节骨性关节炎患者术后关节功能和减轻疼痛。
Abstract:
ObjectiveTo analyze the effect of radiofrequency on knee osteoarthritis in arthroscopic debridement. MethodsDuring the period between June 2003 and June 2004, a group of 40 patients suffered from osteoarthritis, as experimental group, were treated by radiofrequency. Another group of 40 patients without radiofrequency in operation were set as a control. The patients were assessed pre and postoperatively by using the Lysholm score. ResultsThe preoperative Lysholm score of the experimental group was 53.6±6.4, and was significantly increased to 83.4±4.7 (t=21.549, P=0.000) after the operation. Meanwhile, in the control group, the Lysholm score was also increased significantly after the treatment ［55.5±5.1 vs 79.8±6.1; t=20.697, P=0.000)］. Besides, we detected significant differences in totall Lysholm score and pain score between the experiment and control groups after the surgery (83.4±4.7 and 18.6±3.9 vs 79.8±6.1 and 16.6±3.8; t=2.957, P=0.004；t=2.323, P=0.023, respectively). Whereas, no significant difference was found in postoperative strength scores between the two groups (6.3±1.6 vs 6.2±1.5, t=0288, P=0.774). ConclusionsRadiofrequency in arthroscopic debridement can improve the function of the knee joint and alleviate the pain in patients with osteoarthritis.

参考文献/References:

[1]Kirkley A, Birmingham TB, Litchfield RB, et al. A randomized trial of arthroscopic surgery for osteoarthritis of the knee. N Engl J Med, 2008, 359(11):1097-1107.
[2]Day B. The indications for arthroscopic debridement for osteoarthritis of the knee. Orthop Clin North Am, 2005, 36(4):413-417.
[3]Voloshin I, Morse KR, Allred CD, et al. Arthroscopic evaluation of radiofrequency chondroplasty of the knee. Am J Sports Med, 2007, 35(10):1702-1707.
[4]金先跃，王玮，黄德征. 关节镜下射频汽化仪治疗老年性膝骨性关节炎疗效观察. 广西医科大学学报，2005，22 (6)：918-919.
[5]宋长志，董启榕. 射频汽化仪在关节镜下治疗膝盘状软骨损伤中的应用. 中华创伤骨科杂志,2005，7（5）：488-489.
[6]Lysholm J, Gillquist J. Evaluation of knee ligament surgery results with special emphasis on use of a scoring scale. Am J Sports Med, 1982, 10(3):150-154.
[7]Stuart MJ, Lubowitz JH. What, if any, are the indications for arthroscopic debridement of the osteoarthritic knee? Arthroscopy, 2006, 22(3):238-239.
[8]Spahn G, Kahl E, Mückley T, et al. Arthroscopic knee chondroplasty using a bipolar radiofrequencybased device compared to mechanical shaver: results of a prospective, randomized, controlled study. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc, 2008, 16(6):565-573.
[9]Kaplan L, Uribe JW. The acute effects of radiofrequency energy in articular cartilage: an in vitro study. Arthroscopy, 2000, 16(1):2-5.
[10]Bonutti PM, Seyler TM, Delanois RE, et al. Osteonecrosis of the knee after laser or radiofrequencyassisted arthroscopy: treatment with minimally invasive knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am, 2006, 88（Suppl 3）:S69-S75.

更新日期/Last Update: 2013-08-12