[1]王芬,昆多孜,阿也提.阴道镜检查联合LEEP刀治疗宫颈上皮内瘤样病变在新疆地区的临床应用[J].中国微创外科杂志,2010,10(7):623-631.
 Wang Fen,Kun Duozi,A Yeti..Application of Vaginoscopy Combined with LEEP Electrosurgical Excision for Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia in XinJiang Area[J].Chinese Journal of Minimally Invasive Surgery,2010,10(7):623-631.
点击复制

阴道镜检查联合LEEP刀治疗宫颈上皮内瘤样病变在新疆地区的临床应用()
分享到:

《中国微创外科杂志》[ISSN:1009-6604/CN:11-4526/R]

卷:
10
期数:
2010年7期
页码:
623-631
栏目:
出版日期:
2010-07-01

文章信息/Info

Title:
Application of Vaginoscopy Combined with LEEP Electrosurgical Excision for Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia in XinJiang Area
作者:
王芬昆多孜阿也提
新疆自治区人民医院妇科,乌鲁木齐830001
Author(s):
Wang Fen Kun DuoziA Yeti.
Department of Gynecology,People’s Hospital of Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region,Urumqi 830001, China
关键词:
阴道镜高频电波刀(LEEP刀)宫颈上皮内瘤样病变
Keywords:
VaginoscopeLEEP electrosurgical excisionCervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN)
分类号:
R737.33
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
目的评价阴道镜检查联合高频电波刀(LEEP刀)治疗宫颈上皮内瘤样病变(cervical intraepithelial neoplasia,CIN)的临床价值。方法2008年1月~2009年6月对228例宫颈液基薄层细胞学检查(liquidbased thinprep cytology test,TCT)为CIN的患者应用阴道镜检查联合LEEP刀治疗,对比分析阴道镜下宫颈活检的病理与LEEP术后病理结果。结果LEEP刀治疗CIN手术时间(6.3±2.5)min, 术中出血量(7.3±4.1)ml, 术后愈合时间(6.4±0.6)周。下腹胀痛不适发生率为82.0%(187/228),术后阴道不规则出血发生率为90.8%(207/228),无一例发生宫颈管狭窄。阴道镜下宫颈活检的病理与LEEP术后病理诊断相符合208例,符合率为91.2%(208/228);升级9例,占4.0%(9/228);降级11例, 占4.8%(11/228)。177例随访2~24个月,平均13.4月,9例(5.1%,9/177)病变残留,其中1例切缘病变为CIN Ⅱ级行2次LEEP刀手术,其余8例病变轻定期随访至术后12~24个月,TCT、阴道镜检查均正常;2例(1.1%, 2/177)术后10个月复发,均为CIN Ⅰ级,物理治疗后随防至正常;余166例(938%,166/177)治愈。结论阴道镜检查联合LEEP刀治疗CIN安全、高效。
Abstract:
ObjectiveTo evaluate the clinical value of vaginoscope and LEEP electrosurgical excision for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN). MethodsThe clinical data of 228 patients with CIN, who were diagnosed by TCT from January 2008 to June 2009, were analyzed retrospectively. A comparative analysis of pathologic findings was made after LEEP and vaginoscopic biopsy.ResultsThe mean operation time for LEEP was (6.3±2.5) min, and the mean intraoperative blood loss was (7.3±4.1) ml. The mean healing time of the surgical wound was (6.4±0.6) weeks. After the operation, 187 of the 228 patients (82.0%) had abdominal complaints, 207 cases (90.8%) showed irregular vaginal bleeding, whereas no patient had cervical stenosis. In 208 of the patients (91.2%) the results of vaginoscopic biopsy were identical to that of the postLEEP pathological examination; in 9 cases (40%), postLEEP pathological examination showed more advanced lesion than that observed by vaginoscopic biopsy, while in the other 11 cases (4.8%), vaginoscopic biopsy showed more advanced diseases. Followup was achieved in 177 patients for 2 to 24 months with a mean of 13.4 months. Nine of the patients (5.1%, 9/177) showed residual CIN tissues, one of them received a second LEEP because of CIN II detected at cut margin, the other eight patients received followup for 12 to 24 months, during which both TCT and vaginoscopy showed normal results. Recurrent CIN I was detected in two patients (1.1%, 2/177) in 10 months after the operation,physical therapy was then carried out until followup examination showed normal results. The curative rate in this series was 93.8%(166/177).ConclusionsVaginoscope combined with LEEP electrosurgical excision is safe and effective for CIN.

参考文献/References:

[1]拉莱.苏祖克.不同民族妇女中2727例子宫颈癌的统计学分析.新疆医学院学报,1990,9:48.
[2]乐杰,主编. 妇产科学. 第7版. 北京:人民卫生出版社,2008. 267.
[3]贾英,徐东梅,唐良萏.宫颈环形电切术治疗宫颈上皮内瘤变的价值.中国实用妇科与产科杂志,2009,25(8):606-609.
[4]李群,唐兆前,郭兆阳.子宫颈锥切术治疗子宫颈上皮内瘤变和Ia期子宫颈癌99例分析.蚌埠医学院学报,2009, 34(1):25-28.
[5]Shanta V, Krishnamurthi S, Gajalakshmi CK, et al. Epidemiology of cancer of the cervix: global and national perspective. J Indian Med Assoc, 2000,98:49-52.
[6]郎景和,主编,妇产科热点问题聚焦. 北京:人民医学出版社,2006. 673.
[7]樊庆泊,郎景和,沈铿. 子宫颈环型电切除操作在宫颈上皮内瘤变诊治方面的应用. 现代妇产科进展, 2002,11(6):472-473.
[8]李寒松,魏凤华,申桂华,等.高频电刀治疗宫颈上皮内瘤样病变的临床观察. 中国临床医生,2004,32(9): 22-24.
[9]张洁文,王建捷,蔺莉,等.高频电波刀电圈切除术治疗宫颈高危型人乳头瘤病毒感染的效果. 中国微创外科杂志,2007,7(3):225-227.
[10]Kietpeerakool C, Khunamompong S, Srisomboon J, et al. Cervical intraepithelial neoplasia II-III with endocervical cone margin involvement after cervical loop conization: Is there any predictor for residual disease? J Obstet Gynaecol Res, 2007, 33(5):660-664.
[11]Srisomboon J, Kietpeerakool C, Suprasert P, et al. Factors affecting residual lesion in women with cervical adenocarcinoma in situ after cone excisional biopsy. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev, 2007,8(2):225-228.
[12]Tyler LN, Andrews N, Parrish RS, et al. Significance of margin and extent of dysplasia in loop electrosurgery excision procedure biopsies performed for highgrade squamous intraepithelial lesion in predicting persistent disease. Arch Pathol Lab Med, 2007, 131(4):622-624.
[13]CardozaFavarato G, Fadare O. Highgrade squamous intraepithelial lesion (CIN 2 and 3) excised with negative margins by loop electrosurgical excision procedure: the significance of CIN 1 at the margins of excision. Hum Pathol, 2007, 38(5): 781-786.

更新日期/Last Update: 2013-08-12