[1]曾鸿,蒋建渝,杨晓霞.舒芬太尼复合曲马多用于老年髋部手术患者术后静脉自控镇痛的研究[J].中国微创外科杂志,2009,09(11):1025-1028.
　Zeng Hong,Jiang Jianyu,Yang Xiaoxia..Comparison of PatientControlled Intravenous Analgesia with Sufentanil and Sufentanil Combined with Tramadol for Elderly Patients Undergoing Hip Operation[J].Chinese Journal of Minimally Invasive Surgery,2009,09(11):1025-1028.
点击复制

舒芬太尼复合曲马多用于老年髋部手术患者术后静脉自控镇痛的研究()
分享到：

《中国微创外科杂志》[ISSN:1009-6604/CN:11-4526/R]

卷:
09
期数:
2009年11期
页码:
1025-1028
栏目:
出版日期:
2009-11-30

文章信息/Info

Title:
Comparison of PatientControlled Intravenous Analgesia with Sufentanil and Sufentanil Combined with Tramadol for Elderly Patients Undergoing Hip Operation
作者:
曾鸿; 蒋建渝; 杨晓霞
北京大学第三医院麻醉科，北京100191
Author(s):
Zeng Hong;  Jiang Jianyu;  Yang Xiaoxia.
Department of Anesthesiology, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing 100191, China
关键词:
舒芬太尼; 曲马多; 患者自控静脉镇痛
Keywords:
Sufentanil; Tramadol; Patientcontrolled intravenous analgesia
分类号:
R614
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
目的探讨舒芬太尼复合曲马多用于老年髋部手术后患者自控静脉镇痛（patientcontrolled intravenous analgesia,PCIA）的效果与不良反应。方法40例择期在腰麻联合硬膜外麻醉下行髋部手术的老年患者，按随机数字表随机分为单纯舒芬太尼组（S组）和舒芬太尼复合曲马多组（T组），每组各20例。术毕缓慢经静脉注射欧贝8 mg，连接电子镇痛泵。镇痛药物：S组为舒芬太尼100 μg+0.9%NaCl 100 ml，T组为舒芬太尼50 μg+曲马多400 mg+0.9%NaCl 100 ml，负荷剂量1 ml,持续输注速率1.5 ml/h，病人自控镇痛（patientcontrolled analgesia，PCA）剂量0.5 ml，锁定时间15 min。分别于术后4、20、24、48 h随访病人并记录静息时和运动时的视觉模拟评分(visual analogue score, VAS)，各时点的呼吸频率（respiration rate, RR），心率（heart rate, HR），平均动脉压（mean arterial pressure, MAP），脉搏血氧饱和度（peripheral oxygen saturation,SPO2），镇静评分（sedation scale, SS），记录使用镇痛泵48 h内恶心呕吐的发生率。结果术后48 h内，2组患者静态和动态VAS评分的差异均无统计学意义（P＞0.05），除术后4 h 2组患者的动态VAS评分＞3以外，其余各时点2组患者静态和动态VAS均小于3。2组患者HR、SPO2和MAP在各时点组内的差异均无统计学意义（P＞0.05）。术后4、20 h，S组患者的RR较T组明显降低（P＜0.01）。术后4、20 h，S组SS评分显著高于T组（P＜0.01）。2组恶心、呕吐发生率的差异无统计学意义（10% vs 30%, P=0.235; 5% vs 25%, P=0.182）。结论舒芬太尼复合曲马多可以有效用于老年髋部手术后PCIA，与单用舒芬太尼相比，镇痛效果确切，不良反应减少。
Abstract:
ObjectiveTo compare the efficacy and adverse effect of sufentanil and sufentanil combined with tramadol for patientcontrolled intravenous analgesia (PCIA) immediately after hip operation in elderly patients. MethodsTotally 40 elderly patients undergoing selective hip operation were randomly assigned to received sufentanil (S group) or sufentanil plus tramadol (T group, 20 patients in each). After the operation, ondansetron hydrochloride was injected immediately, and PCIA pump was employed. In S group, sufentanil 100 μg + 0.9% NaCl 100 ml was given, while in the T group, sufentanil 50 μg + tramadol 400 mg + 0.9% NaCl 100 ml was used. In both the groups, the loading dose was set at 1 ml, speed of infusion was kept at 1.5 ml/h, patientcontrolled analgesia (PCA) dose was 0.5 ml, and infusion time was locked at 15 min. At 4, 20, 24, and 48 h, the visual analogue score (VAS), respiration rate (RR), heart rate (HR), mean arterial pressure (MAP), peripheral oxygen saturation (SPO2) and sedation scale (SS) of the patients in each group was measured respectively with the patients at resting status. The rate of nausea and vomiting in 48 h was determined as well.ResultsNo significantly differences was noticed in VAS at both resting and moving status between the two groups (P>0.05). In both the groups, the VASs determined at all the time points with the patients at both resting and moving status were lower than 3, expect for that measured at 4 h with the patients at moving status (slightly higher than 3). No significant difference was detected in HR, SPO2 and MAP at all the time points between the two groups (P＞0.05). At 4 and 20 h, the RR in the S group was significantly lower than that in the T group (P＜0.01), whereas, the SS in the S group was significantly higher than that in the T group (P＜0.01). No significant difference exists in the rate of nausea and vomiting between the two groups (10% vs 30%, P=0.235; 5% vs 25%, P=0.182). ConclusionsSufentanil combined with tramadol is effective for PCIA in elderly patients undergoing hip operation, showing similar efficacy with sufentanil alone but less adverse effects.

参考文献/References:

[1]高星杨，刘卫珍.病人自控镇痛（PCA）临床应用进展.中国麻醉与镇痛，2007，9（1）：67-71.
[2]Ahonen J , Olkkola KT, Hynynen M, et al. Comparison of alfentanil, fentanyl and sufentanil for total intravenous anaesthesia with propofol in patients undergoing artery bypass surgery.Br J Anaesth,2000,85(4):533-540.
[3]Sinatra RS, Sevarino FB, Paige D. Patientcontrolled analgesia with sufentanil:a comparison of two different methods of administration. J Clin Anesth, 1996,8(2):123-129.
[4]邬子林,佘守章,刘继云,等. 老年患者全髋置换术后舒芬太尼静脉和硬膜外自控镇痛的可行性.中华麻醉学杂志, 2006,26（11）：1039－1041.
[5]Conti G, Arcangeli A, Antoneli M, et al. Sedation with sufentanil in patients receiving pressure support ventilation has no effect on respiration: a pilot study. Can J Anaesth, 2004,51(5):494-499.
[6]Prause A, Wappler F, Scholz J, et al. Respiratory depression under longterm sedation with sufentanil, midazolam and clonidine has no clinical significance. Intensive Care Med, 2000,26(10):1454-1461.
[7]王雪.不同剂量舒芬太尼术后静脉自控镇痛疗效观察.吉林师范大学学报,2006, 3（1）：89－90.
[8]张瑞芹,方先海,崔晓光.舒芬太尼术后静脉自控镇痛的量效关系.哈尔滨医科大学学报,2006,40(5)：409-411.
[9]Vickers MD, O’Flaherty D, Szekely SM, et al. Tramadol: pain relief by an poioid without depression of respiration. Anaesthesia ,1992,47: 291-296.
[10]Kehlet H, Dahl JB. The value of ‘multimodal’ or ‘balanced’ analgesia in postoperative pain treatment. Anesth Analg, 1993,77(5):1048-1056.

更新日期/Last Update: 2014-01-08