[1]王彦　 王璇　 张丽华　 宋志云　 侯建青　 姜学强.腹腔镜与开腹子宫肌壁间大肌瘤切除术比较[J].中国微创外科杂志,2004,04(6):496-497.
　Wang Yan,WangXuan,Zhang Lihua,et al.A comparison between laparoscopic and open resection for large intramural hysteromyoma[J].Chinese Journal of Minimally Invasive Surgery,2004,04(6):496-497.
点击复制

腹腔镜与开腹子宫肌壁间大肌瘤切除术比较
分享到：

《中国微创外科杂志》[ISSN:1009-6604/CN:11-4526/R]

卷:
04
期数:
2004年6期
页码:
496-497
栏目:
出版日期:
2004-06-30

文章信息/Info

Title:
A comparison between laparoscopic and open resection for large intramural hysteromyoma
作者:
王彦　 王璇　 张丽华　 宋志云　 侯建青　 姜学强
山东省青岛医学院附属烟台毓璜顶医院妇科,烟台,264000
Author(s):
Wang Yan;  WangXuan;  Zhang Lihua;  et al.
Department ofGynecology, Affiliated YuhuangdingHospital ofQingdao Medical College, Yantai624000, China
关键词:
腹腔镜;  子宫肌瘤切除术
Keywords:
Laparoscopy; 　Hysteromyomectomy
分类号:
R737.33
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
目的评价腹腔镜子宫肌壁间大肌瘤切除术的临床价值. 方法回顾分析42例直径6～10 cm单发子宫肌壁间肌瘤病例:腹腔镜组24例,开腹组18例.比较两组术中及术后情况. 结果两组手术均获成功,无明显并发症发生.手术时间腹腔镜组(89.0±26.9)min显著长于开腹组(63.3±20.1)min(t=3.400,P=0.002);术中出血量腹腔镜组(93.6±65.9)ml与开腹组(100.0±48.7)ml无统计学差别(t=-0.347,P=0.731);镇痛剂使用例数腹腔镜组(2/24)显著低于开腹组(9/18)(χ2=7.208,P=0.007);肛门恢复排气时间腹腔镜组(23.5±11.3)h显著低于开腹组(32.0±13.6)h(t=-2.211,P=0.033);术后病率腹腔镜组(2/24)明显低于开腹组(7/18)(χ2=4.033,P=0.045). 结论腹腔镜子宫肌壁间大肌瘤切除术是安全可行的.与开腹手术相比,术后恢复快,术后病率低,术中出血量并未增加,但手术时间明显延长,与肌瘤较大取出费时有关.
Abstract:
Objective　To evaluate the clinical significance of laparoscopic resection for large intramural hysteromyoma.　Methods 　A retrospective analysis was made concerning 42 cases of single intramural hysteromyoma as large as 6~10 cm in diameter: 24 cases underwent laparoscopic hysteromyomectomy and 18 cases received open resection. Intra- and post-operative parameters between the two groups were compared.　Results　All operations in the two groupswere successfully completedwithout complications. The operative time was significantly longer in the laparoscopic group (89·0±26·9 min) than that in the open group (63·3±20·1 min) (t=3·400,P=0·002). No statistical difference was observed in the intraoperative blood loss between the laparoscopic group (93·6±65·9 ml) and the open group (100·0 ±48·7 ml) (t=-0·347, P=0·731). The analgesic requirement was less in the laparoscopic group (2 out of 24 cases ) than that in the open group (9 out of 18 cases) (χ2=7·208,P=0·007). The time to first flatuswas shorter in the laparoscopic group (23·5±11·3 h) than that in the open group (32·0±13·6 h) (t=-2·211, P=0·033). The postoperative pyrexia rate was significantly lower in the laparoscopic group (2/24) than that in the open group (7/18) (χ2=4·033, P=0·045).　Conclusions　Laparoscopic resection for larger intramural hysteromyoma is safe and reliable. As compared with open hysteromyomectomy, it offers more rapid recovery and lower postoperative pyrexia rate, as well as the same amount of blood loss. Its prolonged operative time may be associated with the relatively large size of the hysteromyoma.

参考文献/References:

［1］林金芳.腹腔镜子宫肌瘤切除的手术技术.见:林金芳,主编.实用妇科内镜学.上海:复旦大学出版社,2001.259-260.
［2］苏应宽.某些子宫肌瘤切除术.见:苏应宽,刘新民,主编.妇产科手术学.北京: 人民卫生出版社,1992.110-113.
［3］赵映华,陈惠芳,黎洁颜,等.腹腔镜与开腹筋膜内子宫切除术的比较.中国微创外科杂志,2003,3:319-320.
［4］Dubuisso JB,Fauconnier A,Babaki-Fard K,et al.Laparoscopic myomectomy: a current view.Hum Reprod Update,2000,6: 588-594.

更新日期/Last Update: 2014-06-09