[1]林华　 卞美璐.微波子宫内膜消除术与全子宫切除术的比较[J].中国微创外科杂志,2003,03(4):321-322.
　Lin Hua,Bian Meilu..A comparison between microwave endometrial ablation and total hysterectomy[J].Chinese Journal of Minimally Invasive Surgery,2003,03(4):321-322.
点击复制

微波子宫内膜消除术与全子宫切除术的比较()
分享到：

《中国微创外科杂志》[ISSN:1009-6604/CN:11-4526/R]

卷:
03
期数:
2003年4期
页码:
321-322
栏目:
出版日期:
2003-04-30

文章信息/Info

Title:
A comparison between microwave endometrial ablation and total hysterectomy
作者:
林华　 卞美璐
中日友好医院妇产科,北京,100029
Author(s):
Lin Hua; Bian Meilu.
Department ofObstetrics and Gynecology,China-Japan FriendshipHospital,Beijing100029,China
关键词:
微波子宫内膜消除术(MEA);  月经过多;  全子宫切除术
Keywords:
Microwave endometrial ablation; 　Menorrhagia; 　Total hysterectomy
分类号:
R713.4
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
目的比较微波子宫内膜消除术(MEA)与经腹全子宫切除术治疗月经过多的疗效. 方法将60例月经过多的患者分为MEA组与全子宫切除组各30例,比较两组对治疗月径过多的疗效、手术的出血量、手术时间、能否保留子宫及术后恢复时间. 结果 MEA组与全子宫切除组治疗月经过多的有效率分别为96%(29/30)和100%(30/30),χ2 =0,P=1.0.但两组手术时间分别为(4.0±1.1)min和(68.3±1.9)min,t=-160.42,P=0.00;平均术中出血分别为0ml和50ml. 结论微波子宫内膜消
Abstract:
Objective　To compare the curative effects between microwave endometrial ablation (MEA) and total hysterectomy for the treatment of menorrhagia.　Methods　Sixty patients with menorrhagia were divided into 2 groups with 30 patients in each group, either to MEA or to total hysterectomy (control group). The intraoperative blood loss, operating time, sparing or unsparing of uterus, and length of recovery of the 2 groups were compared.　Results　The effective rates for menorrhagia, operating time, and mean blood loss of MEA group and control group was 96% (29/30) and 100% (30/30) (χ2=0,P=1·0), (4·0±1·1) min and (68·3±1·9) min (t=-160·42,P= 0·00), 0 ml and 50 ml, respectively.　Conclusions　MEA is a novel minimally invasive method for menorrhagia, and its curative effects are similar to that of total hysterectomy. When considered in terms of sparing of uterus and postoperative recovery, MEA is obviously superior to total hysterectomy.

参考文献/References:

［1］苏应宽,刘新民,主编.妇产科手术学.北京:人民卫生出版社,1994.86-87.
［2］Milligan MP,Etokowo GA.Microwave endometrial ablation for menorragia. Obstet Gynecol, 1999, 19: 496-499.
［3］岳晓燕,周应芳,刘运明.子宫内膜去除术的应用现状与发展.中华妇产科杂志,2001, 36:570-571.
［4］Cooper KG, Bain C,Parkin DE. Comparison of microwave endometrial ablation and transcervical resection of the endometrium for treatment of heavy menstrual loss; a randomized trial. Lancet, 1999, 354: 1859-1863.
［5］Downes E, O'Donovan P. Microwave endometrial ablation in the management of menorrhagia: current status. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol, 2000, 12:293-296.
［6］郭绍红.微创外科的概念、现状与未来.中国微创外科杂志,2002,2(增刊):S39-S41.

更新日期/Last Update: 2014-07-02